2013
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of self‐hypnosis on duration of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Learning self-hypnosis to ease childbirth taught as a brief course failed to show any effects on duration of childbirth and other birth outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We developed a brief course in antenatal self-hypnosis to provide women with skills to cope with childbirth. While we did not find any effects on use of epidural analgesia, pain experience and other obstetric birth outcomes [38,39], a positive effect…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…We developed a brief course in antenatal self-hypnosis to provide women with skills to cope with childbirth. While we did not find any effects on use of epidural analgesia, pain experience and other obstetric birth outcomes [38,39], a positive effect…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Results from other studies may give cause to suggest self-hypnosis can be successful when hetero-hypnosis is not. In the Downe et al 2015and Werner et al (2013a; 2013b) studies the authors were unable to demonstrate an effect, which may have been due to absence of common ingredients of studies whereby an effect was demonstrated; notably, teaching self-hypnosis as a self-regulated skill. Some might question whether the use of audio recordings as the sole means of self-hypnosis as employed by Downe et al 2015and Werner et al (2013a;2013b) is actually different from hetero-hypnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Only papers fulfilling the requirements for analysis are included. The trial by Maimburg et al was reported in two papers and one oral presentation [12-14], and the trial by Werner was reported in three papers [15-17]. For the remainder of the review, only the main report for each included trial is cited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%