Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement

Federlin, Marianne; Hiller, Karl‐Anton; Schmalz, Gottfried

doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1173-2

Cited by 32 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Chemical bonding of MDP to hydroxyapatite seems to have added to the bond obtained by microretention for the etched MDP containing specimens as well, especially for PF2. In a clinical study, selective enamel etching significantly increased the survival rate of partial crowns over 6.5 years, confirming the results found in this study 1819…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation

Rohr

Fischer

2017

J Adv Prosthodont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of tooth surface pre-treatment steps on shear bond strength, which is essential for understanding the adhesive cementation process.MATERIALS AND METHODSShear bond strengths of different cements with various tooth surface treatments (none, etching, priming, or etching and priming) on enamel and dentin of human teeth were measured using the Swiss shear test design. Three adhesives (Permaflo DC, Panavia F 2.0, and Panavia V5) and one self-adhesive cement (Panavia SA plus) were included in this study. The interface of the cement and the tooth surface with the different pre-treatments was analyzed using SEM. pH values of the cements and primers were measured.RESULTSThe highest bond strength values for all cements were achieved with etching and primer on enamel (25.6 ± 5.3 - 32.3 ± 10.4 MPa). On dentin, etching and priming produced the highest bond strength values for all cements (8.6 ± 2.9 - 11.7 ± 3.5 MPa) except for Panavia V5, which achieved significantly higher bond strengths when pre-treated with primer only (15.3 ± 4.1 MPa). Shear bond strength values were correlated with the micro-retentive surface topography of enamel and the tag length on dentin except for Panavia V5, which revealed the highest bond strength with primer application only without etching, resulting in short but sturdy tags.CONCLUSIONThe highest bond strength can be achieved for Panavia F 2.0, Permaflo DC, and Panavia SA plus when the tooth substrate is previously etched and the respective primer is applied. The new cement Panavia V5 displayed low technique-sensitivity and attained significantly higher adhesion of all tested cements to dentin when only primer was applied.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation

Rohr

Fischer

2017

J Adv Prosthodont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… Notes : Used modified USPHS criteria . Marginal adaptation: alfa: margin not discernible, probe does not catch; bravo: probe catches on margin but no gap, dentin or liner exposed; charlie: probe catches on margin and gap on probing, dentin or liner exposed; and delta: restoration fractured or missing.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 85%

“…Feldspathic ceramics (eg, Vita MKII, Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co.KG, Bad Säckingen, Germany) were the first class of materials that were used for the production of chairside‐fabricated partial crowns (CCPCs) . Various clinical studies using CCPCs fabricated from feldspathic ceramics have identified material fractures as the primary cause of failure for posterior restorations . In recent years, new materials with improved mechanical properties have been developed (eg, leucite‐reinforced glass ceramics (IPS Empress, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) or lithium disilicate ceramics (IPS.e.max, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)) to increase the fracture resistance and, thereby, reduce the risk of material‐related clinical failures .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated a significant effect of the cementation technique on the survival and success rates of CCPCs. In particular, the usage of self‐adhesive cements with and without selective enamel etching was shown to be a significant factor for the observed debonding rates . Based on these findings, it was concluded that adhesively luted partial CCPCs (with a selective or total‐etch technique) perform better than CCPCs luted with self‐adhesive cements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical evaluation of chairside‐fabricated partial crowns composed of zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate ceramics: 3‐year results of a prospective practice‐based study

Rinke¹,

Pfitzenreuter

Leha

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Prospective practice‐based clinical evaluation of chairside fabricated monolithic partial crowns composed of zirconia‐containing lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic material. Materials and Methods Between October 2013 and September 2014, 71 patients were restored with 92 partial crowns on vital or sufficiently endodontically treated teeth. The monolithic restorations were fabricated chairside (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL) from a glaze‐fired ZLS ceramic material (Celtra Duo, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). Adhesive cementation was performed using the total‐etch technique with one of two dual‐curing composite materials. Modified United States Public Health Service parameters were evaluated annually; moreover, the parameters “time‐dependent survival” (in situ criterion) and “success rates” (event‐free restorations) were evaluated according to Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Results Sixty‐nine patients with 17 premolar and 71 molar partial crowns attended annual follow‐up examinations (observational period: 36.0 ± 5.7 months). Two complete failures were recorded and were caused by a tooth fracture (at 30 months) and a restoration fracture (at 38 months), (3‐year survival rate: 99%; 95% confidence interval (CI 95%): [0.97;1]). One clinical intervention was necessary (endodontic treatment) to maintain function (3‐year success rate: 98%; (CI95%: [0.95:1]). Conclusions Chairside‐fabricated ZLS partial crowns show a good initial clinical performance. However, to further evaluate this new material, clinical data from studies with longer observational periods are required. Clinical Significance Based on this mid‐term evaluation, ZLS ceramics appear to be a promising alternative material for the chairside fabrication of adhesively luted monolithic posterior restorations with a low risk of material‐related complications.

show abstract

“…In situations where multiple follow‐up papers were published by the same research group, the most recent paper was selected. This led to the exclusion of an additional 17 articles (Table ) . Reviewing the references of the remaining 17 articles disclosed additional 4 articles suitable for inclusion.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%