2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) on fine particle emission from two coal-fired power plants in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported that only about 0.5–1.5% of the sulfur is oxidized to SO 3 . However, when a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system has been used in a power plant for NOx abatement, some SO 2 will also be converted into SO 3 with the conversion rate being about 0.25 to 1.25% . After passing through the air pre‐heater (APH), virtually all SO 3 is converted into gaseous H 2 SO 4 by reacting with water vapor at a temperature above its acid dew point .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that only about 0.5–1.5% of the sulfur is oxidized to SO 3 . However, when a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system has been used in a power plant for NOx abatement, some SO 2 will also be converted into SO 3 with the conversion rate being about 0.25 to 1.25% . After passing through the air pre‐heater (APH), virtually all SO 3 is converted into gaseous H 2 SO 4 by reacting with water vapor at a temperature above its acid dew point .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water vapor and SO 3 in the flue gas react to form gaseous H 2 SO 4 . In addition, we know from Li et al [42] that the ammonia (NH 3 ) used in an SCR can react with H 2 O and SO 3 to generate ammonium sulphate ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) and/or bisulphate (NH 4 HSO 4 ). The rapid drop in temperature in the WFGD leads to the supersaturation of all SO 3 molecules and homogeneous liquid and/or heterogeneous solid–liquid aerosols are formed by nucleation mechanisms [43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the flue gas cleaning steps of both power plants and their influence on aerosol formation results in a reasonable explanation for the membrane damage in Karlsruhe compared with the stable SILM operation in Niederaussem (see Table 8)—the presence of larger quantities of SO 3 aerosols, such as sulfuric acid and especially sticky ammonium sulphate and/or bisulphate, in the EnBW power plant (block 8) in Karlsruhe. In particular, the formation of sticky ammonium sulphate and bisulphate aerosols due to the presence of ammonia as a reducing agent in an SCR [42] is possible at the EnBW power plant in Karlsruhe. In addition, it is likely that more gaseous H 2 SO 4 formed in Karlsruhe since the additional oxidation of SO 2 to SO 3 may occur in an SCR [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the introduction of an amine scrubber for CO 2 capture raises another potential issue: The treated exhaust gas from a power plant may contain a large number of fine particles, which can act as condensation sites and carry a large amount of amine in the aerosol phase out of the CO 2 scrubber, resulting in increased amine losses and causing environmental concerns. A recent assessment of the NO x control selective catalytic reduction (SCR) (Li et al 2015b) indicated that the SCR treatment tremendously increased both the number and mass concentration of PM 2.5 emitted by a coal-fired power plant. The presence of fine particles in the flue gas could be attributed to a "penetration window," which is the size range of particles that pass through the ESP, around 100 nm for traditional ESPs (Strand et al 2002;Ylätalo and Hautanen 1998;Zhuang et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%