2004
DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200411000-00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Selected Recovery Conditions on Performance of Repeated Bouts of Intermittent Cycling Separated by 24 Hours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
22
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the current study, other researchers have reported that CWI performed immediately post-exercise resulted in benefit to subsequent exercise performed ~1 h (compared to active recovery; Vaile et al, 2010) and 24 h (compared to passive control; Bosak et al, 2006;Lane and Wenger, 2004) post immersion. In addition, Ingram et.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the current study, other researchers have reported that CWI performed immediately post-exercise resulted in benefit to subsequent exercise performed ~1 h (compared to active recovery; Vaile et al, 2010) and 24 h (compared to passive control; Bosak et al, 2006;Lane and Wenger, 2004) post immersion. In addition, Ingram et.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Currently, there have been only a few studies that have investigated the effects of CWI on exercise performed on a subsequent day (Bosak et al, 2006;Ingram et al, 2009: Lane andWenger, 2004;Vaile et al, 2008). This is an important issue for athletes involved in events that require exercise to be performed over a couple of days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, AR at 40%-50% of VO2max further depleted glycogen stores [38], whereas AR at 30% did not [39]. In the present study, AR was performed at ~30% VO2max in order to emulate other studies that had seen benefits [17,23,24]; however, it has been suggested that if lactate, not glycogen, is the energy source, intensities less than 30% may be more favorable [29]. Thus, the intensity used in this protocol may still have been too high to elicit benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Comparable to the present study, Castagna et al [4] and Graham et al [36] utilized basketball players to examine the effectiveness of AR on repeated sprint ability; however, since those protocols only allowed 30 seconds of recovery it is unclear whether AR was ineffective due more so to the length of recovery or the modality of exercise. As some authors have pointed out previously, one drawback of AR is that it may impede ATP and CP resynthesis [25,29]. Timing is an important consideration because exercise causes a substantial reduction in intramuscular PO2, so an active recovery strategy likely inhibits CP resynthesis during the initial rapid phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation