Effect of Seismic Risk on Lifetime Property Value

Abstract

We examine seismic risk from the commercial real estate investor's viewpoint. We present a methodology to estimate the uncertain net asset value (NAV) of an investment opportunity considering market risk and seismic risk. For seismic risk, we employ a performance-based earthquake engineering methodology called assembly-based vulnerability (ABV). For market risk, we use evidence of volatility of return on investment in the United States. We find that uncertainty in NAV can be significant compared with investors' risk tolerance, making it appropriate to adopt a decision-analysis approach to the investment decision, in which one optimizes certainty equivalent, CE, as opposed to NAV. Uncertainty in market value appears greatly to exceed uncertainty in earthquake repair costs. Consequently, CE is sensitive to the mean value of earthquake repair costs but not to its variance. Thus, to a real estate investor, seismic risk matters only in the mean, at least for the demonstration buildings examined here.

Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code‐conforming reinforced‐concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses

“…EAL is calculated as the product of the mean total rate of occurrence of events of interest and the mean loss conditional on an event of interest occurring [25,31], which may be expressed as…”

Seismic risk management for water pipeline networks

“…The fi nal balance of cost and income over the life-cycle period (Porter et al, 2004) should be the key factor in evaluating the feasibility of a water pipeline-maintenance project. This balance, which is referred to as the value index V 0 , is the resulting value that can be produced by the project operation, and can be expressed as : 23.41] in which B, I, E, C 0 , and C M are the accumulated total amounts of social benefi t, income gain, operational expense, initial cost, and maintenance cost, respectively, during the life of the project.…”

Earthquake Early Warning Systems

“…In Japan, various methods were developed in the 2000s at JMA, Railway Technical Research Institute, and National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) (Horiuchi et al 2005, Tsukada et al 2004, Nakamura and Saita 2007. This progress made earthquake early warning a realistic goal.…”