Effect of SCN lesions on sleep in squirrel monkeys: evidence for opponent processes in sleep-wake regulation

Abstract

Sleep and wakefulness are governed by both the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus (SCN), and a sleep homeostatic process; however, the interaction of these control systems is not well understood. From rodent studies it has been assumed that the SCN promote neither wake nor sleep but gate the homeostatic sleep-promoting process. Yet in humans sleep tendency is lowest during the later waking hours of the day, and sleep duration can be predicted because of the precise circadian timing of waking. Thus in primates, the SCN could assure sleep-wake cycle consolidation by actively promoting or facilitating wakefulness. To evaluate this hypothesis, we examined the sleep-wake and sleep-stage patterns of intact and SCN-lesioned (SCNx) squirrel monkeys maintained in constant light. This diurnal primate has consolidated sleep and wake patterns more similar to man than rodents. Sleep-wake, sleep stages, brain temperature, and drinking circadian rhythms were eliminated, and total sleep time was significantly increased (4.0 hr, P < 0.01) in SCNx monkeys. However, total times in deeper stages of non-rapid eye movement (non-REM; e.g., delta sleep) and REM sleep were not significantly affected by SCN lesions. Increased total sleep time was associated with a reduction in subjective day wake consolidation, as evidenced by substantially shorter wake bout lengths in SCNx monkeys (15 +/- 6 min) as compared to intact monkeys (223 +/- 10 min; P < 0.0001, ANOVA). These findings show that the SCN influence the regulation of daily total wake and sleep times, and implicate an alternative sleep-wake regulatory model in which an SCN-dependent process actively facilitates the initiation and maintenance of wakefulness and opposes homeostatic sleep tendency during the subjective day in diurnal primates.

The Pathophysiology of Insomnia

“…Th ese two processes have been described in the two-process model and related conceptualizations, such as the opponent-process model of sleep-wake regulation. 70 According to the two-process model of sleep regulation, 71 sleep propensity is regulated by the interaction of a wake-dependent process (process S) and a relatively wake-independent circadian process (process C). Process S dictates that greater brain use during wakefulness increases sleep need and is measured by greater u activity in the waking EEG 72 , 73 and higher amplitude EEG power in the d range (0.5-4.5 Hz) during NREM sleep.…”

The Somnolent Youth-Sleep and the Influence of Exercise: A Narrative Review

“…This pacemaker provides coordinated oscillations and specific alignments of events (circadian rhythms) over the course of a day (24 h). This process promotes wakefulness and opposes sleep pressure brought about by the homeostatic process [24]. This homeostatic process causes an ever increasing pressure to sleep during periods of wakefulness and dissipates during bouts of sleep [25].…”

What Keeps Us Awake?—the Role of Clocks and Hourglasses, Light, and Melatonin

“…Thus, during the latter part of the normal waking day, circadian and homeostatic systems work in opposition to ideally ensure a consolidated period of wakefulness. Edgar et al (1993) have first conceptualized this opponent action based on the framework of the two-process model and data acquired in diurnal squirrel monkeys. SCN-lesioned squirrel monkeys significantly increased total sleep time, which was associated with a 15-fold reduction in the length of wake bouts during the subjective day and no changes in the length of the wake bouts during the subjective night, leading the investigators to suggest that the circadian clock is actively involved in the promotion of wakefulness, by opposing the homeostatic accumulated drive for sleep.…”