2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of SCH 23390 on (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine hyperactivity and self-administration in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
116
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since CPP is believed to be a measure of appetitive behavior where the animal associates contextual cues with either a positive or negative feeling produced by the drug, these results provide direct evidence of the rewarding properties of MDMA in rats. A rewarding effect of MDMA has also been shown in the self-stimulation paradigm in rats (Hubner et al, 1988), where MDMA lowers the reward threshold of electrical stimulation, and in the drug self-administration test in rats (Schenk et al, 2003;Daniela et al, 2004) and baboons (Lamb and Griffiths, 1987). The locomotor hyperactivity observed after MDMA injection is also consistent with this drug exerting a positive rewarding effect (Gold and Koob, 1988;Gold et al, 1989a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Since CPP is believed to be a measure of appetitive behavior where the animal associates contextual cues with either a positive or negative feeling produced by the drug, these results provide direct evidence of the rewarding properties of MDMA in rats. A rewarding effect of MDMA has also been shown in the self-stimulation paradigm in rats (Hubner et al, 1988), where MDMA lowers the reward threshold of electrical stimulation, and in the drug self-administration test in rats (Schenk et al, 2003;Daniela et al, 2004) and baboons (Lamb and Griffiths, 1987). The locomotor hyperactivity observed after MDMA injection is also consistent with this drug exerting a positive rewarding effect (Gold and Koob, 1988;Gold et al, 1989a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This elevation of NAcc(sh) dopamine is widely accepted as the basis for drug-induced reward (Wise and Bozarth, 1984;Hoebel, 1985;Koob and Weiss, 1992;Carlezon and Wise, 1996;Everitt et al, 1999;Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988). Conversely, disruption of dopamine transmission attenuates the rewarding effects of MDMA in rats trained to self-administer MDMA (Daniela et al, 2004). Therefore, the enhanced MDMA-induced dopamine efflux observed after previous exposure to MDMA + chronic stress could reflect an increase in the rewarding and addictive properties of MDMA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of this study included very low inactive lever responding, and dose-dependent responding for MDMA. In a subsequent report, Schenk and colleagues reported on the role of DA in MDMA self-administration and hyperactivity (Daniela et al 2004). In this report, the training dose of MDMA was 1.0 mg/kg and experiments were conducted daily during 2-hr tests sessions.…”
Section: Schenk and Colleaguesmentioning
confidence: 99%