1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(97)00001-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of scale-up on the performance of a fluidized-bed reactor for the oxidative coupling of methane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explanation is also supported by high COICO, ratios and selectivities to hydrogen measured in these reactors (not shown), since CO and H2 are primary products of the homogenous oxidation of methane (Zanthoff and Baerns, 1990;Do et al, 1995). Simulations of the oxidative coupling of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor (Pannek and Mleczko, 1997) showed that gas-phase reactions are initiated mainly by the C,+ hydrocarbons. This effect reduces the light-off temperature and the induction period.…”
Section: Factors Influencing C2 Selectivity and Yield In Various Reacmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This explanation is also supported by high COICO, ratios and selectivities to hydrogen measured in these reactors (not shown), since CO and H2 are primary products of the homogenous oxidation of methane (Zanthoff and Baerns, 1990;Do et al, 1995). Simulations of the oxidative coupling of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor (Pannek and Mleczko, 1997) showed that gas-phase reactions are initiated mainly by the C,+ hydrocarbons. This effect reduces the light-off temperature and the induction period.…”
Section: Factors Influencing C2 Selectivity and Yield In Various Reacmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Up to the present, only results of reaction engineering modeling and simulations can be used to assess the performance of industrial-scale bubbling-bed and riser reactors. The simulations of a commercial bubbling-bed reactor indi-CH, + 0, cated that scale-up of this reactor type is associated with a significant drop of C2+ selectivity and yield (Pannek and Mleczko, 1997). The large bubbles in the industrial reactor caused intensification of backmixing of gas in the emulsion phase and suppressed interphase gas exchange.…”
Section: Optimal Reactor Type For Large-scale Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pannek and Mleczko modeled and simulated OCM in a fluidized‐bed reactor, and observed C 2 yields up to 17% which is slightly higher than those obtained in packed‐beds. The same authors also concluded that, in an industrial fluidized‐bed reactor, C 2 yields will be lower when compared with a lab‐scale reactor, due to larger contact times . Kruglov et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Control of temperature, residence time and its distribution depends strongly on the structure and geometry of the catalytic reactor. Even though many studies have been carried out for formulating catalysts to achieve high methane conversion together with improved product selectivity and ethylene yield, the number of studies addressing the effect of reactor type and structure is scarce . The very first reactors used to test OCM were packed‐bed type, which led to the formation of axial and radial temperature gradients in the reactor due to the high exothermicity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the mass transport limitation between bubbles and emulsion phase and the backmixing of gas in the emulsion C 2+ selectivities and yields obtained in laboratoryscale fluidized-bed reactors operated in the bubbling regime were often lower than in fixed beds [6±7]. Since these effects are enhanced in an industrial reactor, a scale-up of bubbling beds to an industrial unit can result in a further significant drop of the C 2+ yield, e.g., in the simulations performed for a La 2 O 3 / CaO catalyst a drop of the C 2+ yield from 18% to 12% was predicted when scaling up from a laboratory reactor (ID = 5 cm) to an industrial unit (ID = 4 m, [8]). Against this background a circulating fluidized bed (CFB, see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%