1993
DOI: 10.3769/radioisotopes.42.470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sample Grain Size on the CO33- Signal Intensity in ESR Dosimetry of Human Tooth Enamel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the situation may be more complex than presented by Sholom et al (1998a). Iwasaki et al (1993) reported a 10% higher radiation response for grains smaller than 75 µm in samples irradiated before grinding, which was attributed to an underlying distortion of the baseline between 0 and 500 mT. Finally, the possible effect of absence of secondary electron equilibrium during irradiation should not be overlooked (see above and Ivannikov et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Parameters Affecting the Sensitivity Of Tooth Enamel To Radimentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the situation may be more complex than presented by Sholom et al (1998a). Iwasaki et al (1993) reported a 10% higher radiation response for grains smaller than 75 µm in samples irradiated before grinding, which was attributed to an underlying distortion of the baseline between 0 and 500 mT. Finally, the possible effect of absence of secondary electron equilibrium during irradiation should not be overlooked (see above and Ivannikov et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Parameters Affecting the Sensitivity Of Tooth Enamel To Radimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Iwasaki et al (1993) have shown that the full range of repeated measurements of signals of equal-weight samples with approximately 1.5 -2 mm grains is 10-27%, whereas it decreases to 3-4% for smaller grains (0.1 -0.8 mm). Hayes et al (1998) have shown that, when a single small piece of enamel is repeatedly inserted into a cavity in a quartz sample tube, the signal peak-to-peak amplitudes in the perpendicular-orientation range vary over 50%.…”
Section: Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variation gives appropriate relative contribution to the uncertainty of dose determination in enamel at the use of universal calibration coefficient, which was taken into account at error estimation. For enamel grain size used, contribution to the uncertainty of radiation-induced signal amplitude due to sample anisotropy was accepted as not exceeding 5% (Iwasaki et al, 1995). The uncertainty of dose determination in enamel (U e , in Gy) was estimated using an expression analogous to that derived in Ivannikov et al (2002), which comprises constant, variable depending on sample quality and dose dependent contributions:…”
Section: Dose Determination In Enamelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unwanted native or background signals eventually over- or underestimate the absorbed doses in enamel. However, the grain sizes 0.5 – 1 mm have been proven to be optimal for minimizing the effects of sample anisotropy in tooth enamel (Iwasaki et al 1993; Haskell et al 1997). Still, tooth enamel is a crystalline material and can show minor anisotropy effects in this optimal grain size, which may over- or underestimate the absorbed doses in enamel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%