2016
DOI: 10.1002/bapi.201610036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of salts and absorption cycles in the capillary coefficient of building materials with different joints

Abstract: in buildings, may be explained by the capillary water migration from the the soil through the porous network of the materials in the building elements. In old buildings, mostly constucted in mansory, the effects of rising damp assume a greater expression, due to the porous materials tipically used such as ceramic bricks, mortars and stones [1], [2].The presence of dissolved salts in the water, which up rises through the porous network of building elements, constitutes an annoying factor for its degradation [8]… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In February 2018, this journal published the article "Interface influence on moisture transport in buildings" [1], wherein an enquiry into the impact of material interfaces on moisture absorption in building materials is documented. This article continues previous research of this group on this topic [2][3][4][5][6], which was originally initiated with the seminal paper of de Freitas et al in 1996. In all of these studies, the interface impacts are characterised with maximum moisture flows over the interface, contrary to the much more widely employed characterisation with interface resistances though [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The investigation in [1] targets three types of material interfaces: 'air space' (two brick samples separated by an air space), 'perfect contact' (two brick samples in direct contact) and 'hydraulic contact' (bonded brick-mortar samples).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In February 2018, this journal published the article "Interface influence on moisture transport in buildings" [1], wherein an enquiry into the impact of material interfaces on moisture absorption in building materials is documented. This article continues previous research of this group on this topic [2][3][4][5][6], which was originally initiated with the seminal paper of de Freitas et al in 1996. In all of these studies, the interface impacts are characterised with maximum moisture flows over the interface, contrary to the much more widely employed characterisation with interface resistances though [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The investigation in [1] targets three types of material interfaces: 'air space' (two brick samples separated by an air space), 'perfect contact' (two brick samples in direct contact) and 'hydraulic contact' (bonded brick-mortar samples).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Other publications on the theme of material interfaces [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] have consistently opted to describe their impact with an interface resistance, the flow through which hence is controlled by the difference in capillary pressure over that interface. The critiqued publication [1], as well as its related articles [2][3][4][5][6], chooses for another approach, by characterising the interface impact via the more direct post-interface flow. This is a peculiar decision, since this strongly restricts the generalisa- Initially, one can best understand this by thinking about the thermal analogon.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of the 'Flow' Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…He can only note that the roughly similar values presented in the article's Table 4 together with their mentioned coefficients of variation of "approximately 15%" instil a notion of acceptable homogeneity, contradicted, however, by the widespread found in Fig. (4). 4).…”
Section: Processing Of Capillary Absorption Testsmentioning
confidence: 81%