2019
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.12843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Compared with enalapril, sacubitril-valsartan reduces cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These benefits may be related to effects on hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling. OBJECTIVE To determine whether treatment of HFrEF with sacubitril-valsartan improves central aortic stiffness and cardiac remodeling compared with enalapril. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 464 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
257
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
15
257
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These data, in contrast with the results of the Paradigm HF Trial [1] and other real-world experiences [6][7][8], may be explained by the electro-mechanical atrial reverse remodeling [13], since significant reduction in atrial volumes, as well an improvement in electrocardiographic indexes of heterogeneity in atrial conduction, were observed in our study population after sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Our findings expand the recently described positive effect of sacubitril/valsartan treatment on atrial volumes [14,15] and among atrial electrical parameters, suggesting the hypothesis of a complete electro-mechanical atrial reverse remodeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data, in contrast with the results of the Paradigm HF Trial [1] and other real-world experiences [6][7][8], may be explained by the electro-mechanical atrial reverse remodeling [13], since significant reduction in atrial volumes, as well an improvement in electrocardiographic indexes of heterogeneity in atrial conduction, were observed in our study population after sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Our findings expand the recently described positive effect of sacubitril/valsartan treatment on atrial volumes [14,15] and among atrial electrical parameters, suggesting the hypothesis of a complete electro-mechanical atrial reverse remodeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, we showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients who experienced VT/VF episodes, both sustained and non-sustained, and appropriate ICD shock events on sacubitril/valsartan treatment at 12 months follow-up. These results may be a consequence of the mechanical and functional reverse ventricular remodeling, since we documented the reduction in ventricular volumes and the improvement in left ventricular function, both systolic and diastolic, confirming the evidences from previous studies [2,15]. However, in contrast with Gonçalves et al [9], we showed a trend in improvement in electrocardiographic indexes of dispersion of ventricular repolarization, which did not reach the statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A total of 6 clinical RCT trials comparing LCZ696 vs. ACEI/ARB included in the meta-analysis (Desai et al, 2019;Kang et al, 2019;McMurray et al, 2014;Solomon et al, 2012Solomon et al, , 2019Velazquez et al, 2019). The detailed characteristics of these 6 studies are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings of sacubitril/valsartan with stunning interest laid the foundation forrecommendations in guidelines [2,7,16]. PIONEER-HF further confirmed the necessity of early use of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF [24], and the reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) concentration was weakly yet significantly correlated with reverse cardiac remodelling at 12 months [25]; however, sacubitril/valsartan showed no better reduction in central aortic stiffness than enalapril in HFrEF [26]. An analysis of the TRANSITION study indicated that sacubitril/valsartan has promising results in patients who are naïve to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment [27] as well as in patients with de novo HFrEF [28].…”
Section: Sacubitril/valsartanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacotherapy Tolvaptan TACTICS-HF [8], AQUAMARINE [9,10], Shirakabe et al [11], EVEREST [12], SECRET, QUEST, METEOR [13] Ivabradine SHIFT [14,15], INTENSIFY, ETHIC-AHF, Bagriy et al [17], CARVIVA HF [18] Sacubitril/valsartan PARADIGM-HF [19][20][21][22][23], PIONEER-HF [24,25], EVALUATE-HF [26], TRANSITION [27,28], PARAMOUNT [29,30], PARAGON-HF [31] Nebivolol SENIORS [33][34][35][36][37], Sessa et al [38], Brehm et al [39], ELANDD [40], CARNEBI [41] Levosimendan LIDO [42], SURVIVE [43], REVIVE [44], LevoRep [45], Zhang et al [46], LION-HEART [47], LEAF [48], Jia et al [49], LAICA [50], Leo-DOR [51] MRA Eplerenone: EPHESUS [75], EMPHASIS-HF [52][53][54][55]…”
Section: Treatments Key Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%