2005
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72777-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Rumen-Degradable Protein Balance and Forage Type on Bulk Milk Urea Concentration and Emission of Ammonia from Dairy Cow Houses

Abstract: As the Dutch government and dairy farming sector have given priority to reducing ammonia emission, the effect of diet on the ammonia emission from dairy cow barns was studied. In addition, the usefulness of milk urea content as an indicator of emission reduction was evaluated. An experiment was carried out with a herd of 55 to 57 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows housed in a naturally ventilated barn with cubicles and a slatted floor. The experiment was designed as a 3 x 3 factorial trial and repeated 3 times. Duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we found a strong linear association between MUN and manure N. This relationship may reflect the strong association between MUN and urinary N reported in the literature (Kohn et al, 2002). The weak relationship between MUN E and NH 3 -N emission found here agreed with results of Powell et al (2008), but contrasted with those of van Duinkerken et al (2005). The latter study however, included dietary treatments with large excesses in dietary CP in the form of RDP primarily, resulting in wide ranges of MUN and NH 3 -N emission.…”
Section: Mun Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we found a strong linear association between MUN and manure N. This relationship may reflect the strong association between MUN and urinary N reported in the literature (Kohn et al, 2002). The weak relationship between MUN E and NH 3 -N emission found here agreed with results of Powell et al (2008), but contrasted with those of van Duinkerken et al (2005). The latter study however, included dietary treatments with large excesses in dietary CP in the form of RDP primarily, resulting in wide ranges of MUN and NH 3 -N emission.…”
Section: Mun Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Unfortunately, feeding excess dietary CP may still be common in US dairy farms as dietary CP averaged 17.8 6 0.1% in a recent survey conducted in 106 large US herds (Caraviello et al, 2006). The work of Van Duinkerken et al (2005) suggested that milk urea nitrogen (MUN) could be used to predict NH 3 -N emission because bulk tank MUN was a good indicator of emission reduction when excess dietary CP was removed from the diet. There are ample evidences that MUN is an accurate predictor of dietary CP (Broderick and Clayton, 1997;Jonker et al, 1998;Kohn et al, 2002) and urinary urea-N excretion (Burgos et al, 2007) nevertheless, under farm-like conditions MUN is affected by management and other nonnutritional factors (Wattiaux et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rumen available N in excess of microbial growth requirements is absorbed as NH 3 , metabolized to urea in the liver, and either recycled or excreted in urine. High protein degradation rates increase urinary N excretion, which can negatively impact the environment (Powell et al, 2010), decrease N utilization efficiency, and impart a metabolic burden associated with increased urea synthesis and excretion that hinders animal performance (Van Duinkerken et al, 2005;Kohn et al, 2005) and fertility (Westwood et al, 2000;Tshuma et al, 2014).…”
Section: Interactions Between Condensed Tannins and Protein In The Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of degradation dynamics of feed proteins in the rumen represents a permanent challenge to optimize the protein nutrition, in order to control the excretion of nitrogen compounds to the environment and to improve the animal welfare (Van Duinkerken et al, 2005;Kaswari et al, 2007;Riasi et al, 2008). The quantitative assessment of the breakdown process is key to carry out an effective and sustainable nutrition of the productive ruminants (Givens et al, 2000;Monteny, 2000, quoted by Van Duinkerken et al, 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%