2013
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2013.812845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of rubber characteristics on asphalt binder properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents the results of J nr , % recovery, and traffic levels determined according to AASHTO MP19-10. It can be seen that the J nr differences of all binders containing CRM exceed the maximum allowable value of 75%, which is consistent with the findings by Wills et al [36]. This phenomenon was mainly due to the binders' extremely low J nr values at 0.1 kPa.…”
Section: Permanent Deformationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 1 presents the results of J nr , % recovery, and traffic levels determined according to AASHTO MP19-10. It can be seen that the J nr differences of all binders containing CRM exceed the maximum allowable value of 75%, which is consistent with the findings by Wills et al [36]. This phenomenon was mainly due to the binders' extremely low J nr values at 0.1 kPa.…”
Section: Permanent Deformationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As expected, both rubberized binders prepared by terminal blend and continuous blend showed higher softening point, apparent viscosity, and lower penetration value compared to control (bitumen 80/100 penetration). This confirmed previous studies that incorporating rubber crumb to base bitumen results in higher viscosity and elasticity [6,11,22]. It is important to note that the rubberized binder produced by the terminal blend (TB) showed higher softening point and apparent viscosity followed by a continuous blend binder (CB) and control.…”
Section: Characterization Of Binderssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The development of an effective interaction between bitumen and rubber is mainly an experimental iterative process. Previous studies determined that the properties of rubberized binders are highly governed by the selection of rubber crumb parameters (rubber types, rubber size, and rubber contents) and blending parameters (blending temperature, blending duration, and blending rate) [5,6]. Modification of these parameters will affect the rubberized binder properties and imposes on the performance of the rubberized asphalt mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of crumb rubber in asphalt pavements has shown promising results in previous studies (Shafabakhsh et al 2014;Moreno et al 2013;Hossain et al 2016;Ghavibazoo, Abdelrahman 2014). Considering facts, that crumb rubber modified bitumen performance mainly depends on processing conditions, there are still open questions related with modifying temperature, interaction time, crumb rubber type and amount (Lo Presti et al 2012;Jeong et al 2010;Willis et al 2013;Wang et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%