1960
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1960.00021962005200050011x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Row Spacing and Plant Population on Performance of Corn, Grain Sorghum and Forage Sorghum1

Abstract: Synopsis Corn performance was unsatisfactory in 20‐inch uncultivated rows. Grain and forage sorghums performed favorably in narrow rows. In grain sorghum, evaporative power of the air, soil temperature, light intensity, and evaporation from the soil surface decreased with decreasing row width.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
18
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
7
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study was in confirmation of number of grains per head playing a major contributive role towards grain yield of sorghum. ) but significantly higher than the grain yield (2433 kg ha -1 ) obtained from row spacing at 60 cm apart (Table 1).Similar response to row spacing has been reported in previous studies where similar row spacing produced higher yields of sorghum grains (Stickler & Laude, 1960;Steiner, 1986), forage (Stickler & Laude, 1960) and other crops such as soybean (De Bruin & Pedersen, 2008). Higher biomass production of sorghum crop with a narrower row spacing of 19cm has been mentioned by Snider et al (2012), and the phenomenon might be due to the better light interception (Steiner, 1986) and decreased inter-row competition between pants (De Bruin & Pederson, 2008).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study was in confirmation of number of grains per head playing a major contributive role towards grain yield of sorghum. ) but significantly higher than the grain yield (2433 kg ha -1 ) obtained from row spacing at 60 cm apart (Table 1).Similar response to row spacing has been reported in previous studies where similar row spacing produced higher yields of sorghum grains (Stickler & Laude, 1960;Steiner, 1986), forage (Stickler & Laude, 1960) and other crops such as soybean (De Bruin & Pedersen, 2008). Higher biomass production of sorghum crop with a narrower row spacing of 19cm has been mentioned by Snider et al (2012), and the phenomenon might be due to the better light interception (Steiner, 1986) and decreased inter-row competition between pants (De Bruin & Pederson, 2008).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Reducing the distance between rows improves weed control (Walker & Buchanan, 1982) by increasing crop competition and reducing light transmission to the soil (Andrade et al, 2002). Narrow row spacing results in higher grain yields in soybean (De Bruin & Pederson, 2008) and in other crops (Stickler & Laude, 1960). Narrow row spacing resulting in higher yield is explained by the improved light interception (Steiner, 1986) and decreased plant to plant competition between plants (De Bruin & Pederson, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of row spacing on water uptake was not considered in soil water balance simulations. As increase in plant population increased the water uptake and reduced evaporation losses (Stickler and Laude, 1960), higher water requirement might have increased water stress in narrow row spacing (45 cm) which in turn affected crop growth and yield parameters (Table 2). Berenguer and Faci (2001) reported that low plant population resulted in greater tiller production, number of grains per panicle and higher weight of grain which would compensate for the lower number of plants.…”
Section: Water Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stickler and Laude (1960) reported no differences in forage sorghum silage yield in row spacings of 51 to 102 cm, whereas Sullivan (1961) …”
Section: R E S U M E N -S U M a R I Omentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Stickler and Laude (1960) reported no differences in forage sorghum silage yield in row spacings of 51 to 102 cm, whereas Sullivan (1961) found that forage sorghum yielded more in narrow than in wide rows. Sudangrass seeded in narrow rows tillered to compensate for fewer plants and thus increased yield (Roller and Scholl, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%