2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1411-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Different Pouch Size in Chinese T2DM Patients with BMI 30–35 kg/m2

Abstract: In this short-term study, in Chinese T2DM patients with BMI 30-35 kg/m(2), we observed a greater efficiency on weight loss and glycemic control with smaller pouch size compared to larger pouch size. In the future, long-term follow-up and large sample study will be necessary to confirm these outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the main reason for not lowering the cut-off for surgery was the economic and national regularity conditions rather than the safety of the procedure, as already the action BMI cut points are reduced by 2.5 kg/ m 2 to BMI 27.5, 32.5, and 37.5 kg/m 2 for Asian populations due to ethnic liability for obesity-associated medical problems [15]. In addition, many studies in the literature have proved the safety and effectiveness of metabolic surgery in patients with mild obesity especially in patients with T2DM [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. A recent meta-analysis by Ji et al showed the safety of BMS in general in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI < 30 kg/m 2 [25], while Wang L concluded the same effect with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m 2 [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the main reason for not lowering the cut-off for surgery was the economic and national regularity conditions rather than the safety of the procedure, as already the action BMI cut points are reduced by 2.5 kg/ m 2 to BMI 27.5, 32.5, and 37.5 kg/m 2 for Asian populations due to ethnic liability for obesity-associated medical problems [15]. In addition, many studies in the literature have proved the safety and effectiveness of metabolic surgery in patients with mild obesity especially in patients with T2DM [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. A recent meta-analysis by Ji et al showed the safety of BMS in general in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI < 30 kg/m 2 [25], while Wang L concluded the same effect with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m 2 [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review in 2020 gathered studies that evaluated the gastric pouch or gastrojejunostomy size on weight outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; of fourteen studies found, five reported poorer results for larger pouches [ 8 , 9 , [24] , [25] , [26] ], while other studies did not find any associations between weight outcome and pouch size [ [11] , [12] , [13] , 15 , 23 , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] ]. The mentioned review article concluded that larger pouches were associated with poorer outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy regarding the size of the gastric pouch has persisted over the past 30 years. Scholars have performed many studies on the postoperative efficacy of different gastric pouch sizes (9)(10)(11). Much of the recent literature focuses on the short-term impact of gastric pouch size on the weight loss of patients with BMI > 35 kg/m2 after RYGB, and the results are controversial (12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%