2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.04.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of roughness scale on contact stiffness between solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the contact interface evolution (profile evolution and third body flows) on the contact stiffness was highlighted for both the sticking and the sliding conditions for the two values of the initial roughness. The presented results were in good agreement with the results recovered by the analytical/numerical models presented in [43,[46][47][48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of the contact interface evolution (profile evolution and third body flows) on the contact stiffness was highlighted for both the sticking and the sliding conditions for the two values of the initial roughness. The presented results were in good agreement with the results recovered by the analytical/numerical models presented in [43,[46][47][48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The estimated stiffness ranged between 2.7 × 10 11 (Pa/m) and 6.1 × 10 11 (Pa/m), when increasing the contact pressure between 0.1 MPa and 1 MPa. The increase in contact stiffness as a function of the contact pressure was in agreement with the theoretical and numerical results presented in [46], in which contact stiffness was studied by using an elastic contact model between a smooth plane and a rough surface.…”
Section: Contact Stiffness Identificationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, compared to the other two models, the IBS appears to be less impacted by the global events. Nonetheless, the results for the short and long-run relationships between the ASE, CBS and IBS models' variable are generally in line with the conclusions of other studies [12][13][14].…”
Section: The Results and Findingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To correlate the cutting signature of NFRP with the cutting contact scale, we introduce a multiscale decomposition method of the surface topography based on wavelets transform [41][42][43]. This approach determine the multiscale transfer function of the morphological modification in surface topography after profile milling process denoted by Multiscale Process Signature (MPS) [29].…”
Section: Multiscale Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%