Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(99)00319-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of roughness, frustration, and antiferromagnetic order on magnetic coupling of Fe/Cr multilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
86
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the picture described for FM/AF bilayers [8] is different for closely coupled multilayers where interactions between multiple ferromagnetic (FM) layers and interactions between interfaces should be taken into account. Similar considerations also apply to the magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) and scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis (SEMPA) studies [17] on Fe/Cr/Fe trilayers and magnetization and ferromagnetic resonance studies of CoFe/Mn/CoFe trilayers [10], all of which specialize to a specific type of spacer layer and do not include the multilayer interactions responsible for our GAF behavior. Our results are thus complementary yet distinct from the results of bilayer/trilayer experiments.…”
Section: Pacs Numbers: 7570pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the picture described for FM/AF bilayers [8] is different for closely coupled multilayers where interactions between multiple ferromagnetic (FM) layers and interactions between interfaces should be taken into account. Similar considerations also apply to the magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) and scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis (SEMPA) studies [17] on Fe/Cr/Fe trilayers and magnetization and ferromagnetic resonance studies of CoFe/Mn/CoFe trilayers [10], all of which specialize to a specific type of spacer layer and do not include the multilayer interactions responsible for our GAF behavior. Our results are thus complementary yet distinct from the results of bilayer/trilayer experiments.…”
Section: Pacs Numbers: 7570pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of the multilayer, being the sum of the individual layer thicknesses, is commonly in the nm range. The magnetic coupling in multilayer systems is shown to be strongly dependent on the layer thickness, the interface quality/roughness [5,6] and the lattice mismatch [7], which in turn can result in magnetic frustration and non collinear coupling [8,9]. The applicability of magnetic materials depends on how much control one has over these features.…”
Section: Magnetic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 A simple magnetic multilayer is made of two alternating layers (of different materials), where at least one of them is ferromagnetic (FM). The period of the multilayer, being the sum of the individual layer thicknesses, is commonly in the nm range.…”
Section: Magnetic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that, although the hysteresis loops of Pt/Fe and Cr/Fe are very similar, the mechanisms by which the Pt and Cr increase the interactions between islands are different for both materials: Pt is a paramagnetic material in which the coupling is related to the polarization of the interface region by the Fe islands and, in the case of the Cr, this element is an antiferromagnet in the bulk state that can couple the Fe islands via exchange interactions. Thus, the lower remanence values of the Cr/Feisland system could be related to frustration effects caused by the oscillatory nature of Fe-Cr-Fe coupling 1 in the complex Cr/Fe-island geometry ͑similar to the effect of roughness in Fe/Cr multilayers 35,36 ͒. A good probe of AF order in the Cr layers of Fe/Cr samples can be taken from exchange bias measurements, 37,38 that is, from the presence of a field shift of the hysteresis loop in materials composed of ferromagnetic-AF interfaces after a FC process from above the NĂ©el temperature of the antiferromagnet.…”
Section: A Morphological and Magnetic Properties Of The Capped Fe Ismentioning
confidence: 99%