2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of roll speed ratio on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of 0.18 wt% carbon steel deformed by differential speed rolling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the small amount of strain (~0.4) introduced into the sample, the structure seemed to be highly deformed but with no indication of forming ultrafine grains. By increasing the introduced strain, the structure became more severely deformed after the fourth pass, which is equal to a strain of ~1.7; ultrafine grains were observable using the EBSD, as seen from Figure 4b-d, and these results were like those from previous investigations [20,21]. The microstructure showed relatively elongated grains with regular orientations along the rolling direction after the four-pass DSR deformation.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Due to the small amount of strain (~0.4) introduced into the sample, the structure seemed to be highly deformed but with no indication of forming ultrafine grains. By increasing the introduced strain, the structure became more severely deformed after the fourth pass, which is equal to a strain of ~1.7; ultrafine grains were observable using the EBSD, as seen from Figure 4b-d, and these results were like those from previous investigations [20,21]. The microstructure showed relatively elongated grains with regular orientations along the rolling direction after the four-pass DSR deformation.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These samples were severely deformed by DSR method utilizing two working rolls whose diameter was 220 mm. The roll-speed-ratio of 1:4 for the lower and upper rolls was selected because the grain size in the sample deformed at roll-speed-ratio of 1:4 was finer relatively than the grain sizes at roll-speed-ratio lower than 1:4 [3,7,11]. The speed of the lower roll was fixed to be ~50 mm/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the cross rolling introduced by Oertel et al [16] was conducted on molybdenum plates to enhance the metal’s formability due to the developed homogeneity of texture and microstructure refinement. Asymmetrical rolling was adopted by Hamad et al [17] to obtain equiaxed ultrafine ferrite grains in 0.18 wt % carbon steel. The cross-roll rolling was applied by Kim et al [18] to manufacture AZ31 Mg sheets with uniform texture intensity from the surface layer to the middle layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%