2013
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Risk-Reduction Counseling With Rapid HIV Testing on Risk of Acquiring Sexually Transmitted Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
112
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…34 While individually tailored to address patient-specific HIV/STI risk behavior and negotiation of achievable risk reduction steps, the intervention focused primarily on individual-level risk behavior. Incorporating dyadic and psychosocial influences may be areas of focus for future intervention development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 While individually tailored to address patient-specific HIV/STI risk behavior and negotiation of achievable risk reduction steps, the intervention focused primarily on individual-level risk behavior. Incorporating dyadic and psychosocial influences may be areas of focus for future intervention development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for each decision are given in Appendix 3. Articles were excluded for not being a RCT or other suitable study, as specified in our inclusion criteria; not having the sufficient percentage of MSM in the study population; [137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145] not including a sufficient percentage of HIV-negative participants; [146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] or not being an individually focused intervention, instead focusing on groups or structural factors. [157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167] Other reasons for exclusion, such as interventions not being brief, reporting a pilot trial, reporting non-HIV-specific data (e.g.…”
Section: -106mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In October 2013, new findings emerged from a study involving a cross-section of clients (n=5012) attending STI/HIV clinics in 9 US cities (Metsch et al, 2013). In contrast to RESPECT, this study included gay men, youth, and HIV-diagnosed clients, and used STI diagnoses to evaluate risk reduction.…”
Section: Prevention Outcomes Associated With Risk Reduction Counsellingmentioning
confidence: 99%