The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5686-6_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Reverberation on Directional Sensitivity of Auditory Neurons: Central and Peripheral Factors

Abstract: In Advances in Auditory Research: Physiology, Psychophysics and Models, edited by E. Lopez-Poveda and R. Meddis, Springer INTRODUCTION Indoors and in nature alike, the auditory scenes that we perceive unfold in reverberant environments. In a reverberant sound field, reflected acoustic waves reach the listener from all directions, interfering with the direct sound and distorting the binaural cues for sound localization such as interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD). In previous work (Devore et al.,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The azimuth-difference benefit is decreased in reverberant environments compared to anechoic conditions (Plomp, 1976 ; Bronkhorst and Plomp, 1990 ; Culling et al, 2003 ; Lavandier and Culling, 2007 ; Ruggles and Shinn-Cunningham, 2011 ). Decreased interaural coherence (degrading spatial segregation cues) and decreased temporal-envelope modulation both contribute to increased speech-reception thresholds in reverberant environments (Hartmann, 1983 ; Rakerd and Hartmann, 1985 , 2005 ; Lavandier and Culling, 2007 , 2008 ; Devore et al, 2009 , 2010 ; Devore and Delgutte, 2010 ; Ihlefeld and Shinn-Cunningham, 2011 ; Monaghan et al, 2013 ). Consistent with theories of binaural unmasking such as equalization-cancelation (Durlach, 1972 ), decreased interaural coherence would increase the masking effect of interfering sounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The azimuth-difference benefit is decreased in reverberant environments compared to anechoic conditions (Plomp, 1976 ; Bronkhorst and Plomp, 1990 ; Culling et al, 2003 ; Lavandier and Culling, 2007 ; Ruggles and Shinn-Cunningham, 2011 ). Decreased interaural coherence (degrading spatial segregation cues) and decreased temporal-envelope modulation both contribute to increased speech-reception thresholds in reverberant environments (Hartmann, 1983 ; Rakerd and Hartmann, 1985 , 2005 ; Lavandier and Culling, 2007 , 2008 ; Devore et al, 2009 , 2010 ; Devore and Delgutte, 2010 ; Ihlefeld and Shinn-Cunningham, 2011 ; Monaghan et al, 2013 ). Consistent with theories of binaural unmasking such as equalization-cancelation (Durlach, 1972 ), decreased interaural coherence would increase the masking effect of interfering sounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%