2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of retained austenite on the dynamic tensile behavior of a novel quenching-partitioning-tempering martensitic steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the increased temperature and strain rate affect the mechanical response of steels, especially of steels with a (meta)stable austenite fraction. Several authors reported excellent behaviour of Q & P steels tested at high strain rates (500-2000 s −1 ), certainly concerning the deformation capacity [39,40].Although static tests were performed at high and low temperatures and dynamic room temperature tests, all revealed interesting aspects on the mechanical behaviour of Q & P steels and limited to no data is available on the dynamic response of Q & P steels at temperatures different from room temperature. Assessment and understanding of the combined effect of high strain rates and temperatures deviating from room temperature on the metastable austenite are crucial in evaluating the potential of Q & P steels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the increased temperature and strain rate affect the mechanical response of steels, especially of steels with a (meta)stable austenite fraction. Several authors reported excellent behaviour of Q & P steels tested at high strain rates (500-2000 s −1 ), certainly concerning the deformation capacity [39,40].Although static tests were performed at high and low temperatures and dynamic room temperature tests, all revealed interesting aspects on the mechanical behaviour of Q & P steels and limited to no data is available on the dynamic response of Q & P steels at temperatures different from room temperature. Assessment and understanding of the combined effect of high strain rates and temperatures deviating from room temperature on the metastable austenite are crucial in evaluating the potential of Q & P steels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the increased temperature and strain rate affect the mechanical response of steels, especially of steels with a (meta)stable austenite fraction. Several authors reported excellent behaviour of Q & P steels tested at high strain rates (500-2000 s −1 ), certainly concerning the deformation capacity [39,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies involving quasi-static tensile tests have indicated that the ρ ̅ A of retained austenite rapidly increases from 11.62×10 14 m −2 before deformation to 42.16×10 14 m −2 with an increase in the strain due to the multiplication of dislocations, which leads to a high strain hardening behavior. However, the ρ ̅ M of martensite does not exhibit a similar change, but instead decreases from 6.59×10 14 m −2 before deformation to 4.99×10 14 m −2 at 3% strain, and then gradually increases to 6.52×10 14 m −2 at fracture, a value which is still lower than that before deformation [48]. This phenomenon was explained by the DARA effect, in that the reduction in ρ ̅ M during initial deformation reflects the fact that the number of dislocations transported to the retained austenite exceeds the number produced in the martensite by dislocation multiplication.…”
Section: Effect Of Microstructure On Apparent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The results obtained indicate that Q-P-T steel consists of a martensitic matrix with retained austenite, whereas the Q&T steel consists essentially of single-phase martensite. Previous work has indicated that the average dislocation density ( M p ) in the martensite of this Q-P-T steel is 6.59×10 14 m −2 before deformation, but is 6.78×10 14 m −2 in Q&T steel, and so it is the lower dislocation density of Q-P-T steel that leads to its lower yield strength [48]. This lower dislocation density is attributed to a depletion of carbon in the martensite matrix during Q-P-T that is caused by a partitioning of carbon from the supersaturated martensite to retained austenite, a phenomenon that does not occur in Q&T steel due to the effective absence of retained austenite.…”
Section: Effect Of Microstructure On Apparent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation