2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation periods on pork quality and fatty acid profile of M. longissimus thoracis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feeding is largely responsible for these results, as pigs reared outdoors usually have access to pasture, and under the Montanera system they also have access to bellota, a natural fruit of the oak tree, which serves as a great differential and confers special characteristics to the final product. 52 Wi ȩcek et al 53 evaluated the effect of feed restriction on growing and finishing pigs and found that animals under longer restriction periods had lower carcass fat content, with less saturated and more mono-and polyunsaturated fat. Rauw et al 54 also reported that high intake and low feed frequency resulted in an increase in the content of saturated fat on the carcass, as fatter animals generally have higher levels of saturated fat.…”
Section: Increasing -3 In Raw Meat Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feeding is largely responsible for these results, as pigs reared outdoors usually have access to pasture, and under the Montanera system they also have access to bellota, a natural fruit of the oak tree, which serves as a great differential and confers special characteristics to the final product. 52 Wi ȩcek et al 53 evaluated the effect of feed restriction on growing and finishing pigs and found that animals under longer restriction periods had lower carcass fat content, with less saturated and more mono-and polyunsaturated fat. Rauw et al 54 also reported that high intake and low feed frequency resulted in an increase in the content of saturated fat on the carcass, as fatter animals generally have higher levels of saturated fat.…”
Section: Increasing -3 In Raw Meat Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted feeding reduces body adiposity and IMF content (Lebret et al, 1996;Č andek-Potokar et al, 1998;Mason et al, 2005;Skiba, 2010) and also increases the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids (Daza et al, 2007;Więcek et al, 2011) A high-protein diet has been shown to reduce IMF (Essé n- Gustavsson et al, 1994), whereas a low-protein/ high-energy (Blanchard et al, 1999) or moderately reduced energy and protein diet (da Costa et al, 2004;Tang et al, 2010) has been shown to increase the IMF content. Greater accretion of fat (and protein) was also reported for animals that were switched from a restricted to an ad libitum feed intake (Skiba, 2010), with the final body composition depending on the duration of realimentation (Hornick et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar result was reported by ElHusseiny et al (2008) in broiler deprived from feed during the first 48 h post-hatch. It has been reported in pigs that SFAs and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) content in pork meat decrease with decreasing fatness, leading to a Fatty Acid Composition of Post-hatch Feed-deprived Broiler Meat (S. Sugiharto et al) 235 higher relative content of PUFAs and the resultant increase in the PUFAs/SFAs ratio (Więcek et al, 2011). Consistent with the abdominal fat content, the composition of fatty acids in breast meat did not differ between the post-hatch feed deprivedand undeprived-broilers in the current study (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of factors have been reported to influence the fatty acid composition in meat, and that feed restriction/deprivation is one of the most important factors (Więcek et al, 2011). Under practical conditions, the post-hatch chicks are often withheld from feed and water for substantial time during the transportation from the hatchery to the farm (Juul-Madsen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation