2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of residual stresses on the hardness of bulk metallic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since sample A was subjected to tensile pre-stresses at the Top area, τ max reduced dramatically to a mean value of 2.6 GPa, whereas the compressive pre-stresses at the Bottom area slightly increased τ max to a mean value of 3.2 GPa. Consistent with our previous works 25,29 compressive stress showed less significant effect on the pop-in load than tensile stress. A straightforward mechanics analysis shows that τ max of both compressive and tensile sides needs to be corrected by the pre-stress or residual stress.…”
Section: -3supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since sample A was subjected to tensile pre-stresses at the Top area, τ max reduced dramatically to a mean value of 2.6 GPa, whereas the compressive pre-stresses at the Bottom area slightly increased τ max to a mean value of 3.2 GPa. Consistent with our previous works 25,29 compressive stress showed less significant effect on the pop-in load than tensile stress. A straightforward mechanics analysis shows that τ max of both compressive and tensile sides needs to be corrected by the pre-stress or residual stress.…”
Section: -3supporting
confidence: 81%
“…As a result, mechanical properties such as fatigue behavior [23] and roomtemperature plasticity [24] vary. Recently, the research of Wang et al [25] indicated that tensile residual stress reduces the hardness significantly while compressive residual stress produces only a small effect on the hardness. As for glassy ribbons, the wheelside surface with a higher cooling rate should possess a compressive residual stress, according to the residual stress profile of a metallic glass plate [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, subsequent studies showed that shot peening produced a soft layer (tens of micrometres), which may sacrifice the fatigue property of BMG. 6,7 Similar to but having more advantages over shot peening, laser shock peening (LSP) has been widely used to improve wear resistance and fatigue performance in metallic materials. [8][9][10] In the LSP process, a shock wave is generated and propagates into the target through the interaction of a pulsed high intensity laser beam and absorption layer on the metallic target surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%