1996
DOI: 10.1021/ma960141e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Residual Dipolar Interactions on the NMR Relaxation in Cross-Linked Elastomers

Abstract: For elastomer networks above the glass transition temperature Tg, a unified approach is presented to relate the residual dipolar couplings in various independent NMR experiments to the crosslink density. This is demonstrated on a series of cross-linked poly(styrene-co-butadiene) elastomers. The presence of dynamic physical and permanent chemical cross-links leads to a nonzero average of the homonuclear and heteronuclear dipolar couplings, which results in a solid-like NMR relaxation behavior. The residual dipo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
136
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
136
2
Order By: Relevance
“…NMR was applied to filled rubbers by studying the magnetization decay after a pulse sequence of a magnetic field. [30][31][32] The relaxation process showed a fast decaying component corresponding to unbound matrix and a slow decaying component corresponding to the bound matrix from which the immobilized layer thickness was estimated to be in the range 1-2 nm. 30 DSC was also used both in the step scan and in the modulated scan configurations to quantify the immobilized matrix fraction in nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMR was applied to filled rubbers by studying the magnetization decay after a pulse sequence of a magnetic field. [30][31][32] The relaxation process showed a fast decaying component corresponding to unbound matrix and a slow decaying component corresponding to the bound matrix from which the immobilized layer thickness was estimated to be in the range 1-2 nm. 30 DSC was also used both in the step scan and in the modulated scan configurations to quantify the immobilized matrix fraction in nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can obtain similar results using a distribution of the end-to-end vectors of the crosslinked polymer segments 14) . In this case no long correlation time s S (l1 ms) is used; the system is viewed as a rigid lattice for larger scales, really a more convincing assumption for strong cross-linked polymers.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, it is a hint of any kind of a distribution of decay processes. There are two basic concepts for an explanation, referred to as "distribution of interactions" (model 1) [11][12][13] and "distribution of the endto-end-vector" (model 2) 14) . A first point in both models is based on the existence of a very fast (s f f 10 -9 s), small (inside a monomeric unit) but anisotropic (due to the fixed chain geometry of larger chain parts) motion (Fig.…”
Section: Magnetization Decay and Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the mobility contrast between hydrophobic and crosslinking domains reduces in ELR microgels which are more organized in terms of polypeptide composition compared to native a-elastin microgels. The increase in the crosslink density reduces the segmental motions of oligopeptides 49 and the size of the microgel. Hence, T 2 relaxation time becomes shorter as is shown in Fig.…”
Section: H Transverse Magnetization Relaxation (T 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%