2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of repeated administration of lipopolysaccharide on inflammatory and stress markers in saliva of growing pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the release of TXB 2 and the marked elevation of the pulmonary arterial pressure was greatly reduced (Klosterhalfen et al, 1992). Additionally, CRP levels in porcine saliva are suggested to be tolerance subjective (Escribano et al, 2014).…”
Section: Endotoxin Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the release of TXB 2 and the marked elevation of the pulmonary arterial pressure was greatly reduced (Klosterhalfen et al, 1992). Additionally, CRP levels in porcine saliva are suggested to be tolerance subjective (Escribano et al, 2014).…”
Section: Endotoxin Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IgA has been described as a stress biomarker in rats [117], dogs [118] and humans [119]. In pigs, an increase in saliva IgA has been reported after immobilization [84, 120], in endotoxemia [121], and after isolation [63]. In the case of isolation, IgA was more strongly affected than other markers such as cortisol and testosterone [63].…”
Section: Biomarkers Of Stress Studied In Pigsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recent studies performed over the enzyme adenosine deaminase (ADA) in saliva samples showed a powerful and cheap tool for health status assessment in pigs [5]. Other salivary biomarkers such as α-amylase [6], cortisol, chromogranin A, immunoglobulin A or testosterone [7] could be used as a practical and non-invasive tool for reflecting the activity of different physiological systems involved in the stress response and the immune system in pigs [8]. Furthermore, a penbased collection of oral fluids has been used to monitor the circulation of several pathogens, such as the porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRS) [9], porcine circovirus Type 2 [10], influenza A virus [11] and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%