2000
DOI: 10.2307/1468121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of removal of wood on streambed stability and retention of organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another large-scale (175-m reach) debris dam removal, Bilby (1981) reported a 72% loss in fine sediments stored behind debris dams that were collected in the ponding basin below the dam removal reach. The remaining inorganic substrate in our treatment stream consisted primarily of coarse sediments (pebbles and cobbles), which were no longer embedded in fine sediments, a result also noted by Díez et al (2000) in their wood removal manipulation. As expected, FIP export declined during the leaf addition periods with the fast breakdown leaves having the least retentive capacity compared to the addition of slow and mixed leaf species (Fig.…”
Section: Cpom and Fpom Standing Cropmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another large-scale (175-m reach) debris dam removal, Bilby (1981) reported a 72% loss in fine sediments stored behind debris dams that were collected in the ponding basin below the dam removal reach. The remaining inorganic substrate in our treatment stream consisted primarily of coarse sediments (pebbles and cobbles), which were no longer embedded in fine sediments, a result also noted by Díez et al (2000) in their wood removal manipulation. As expected, FIP export declined during the leaf addition periods with the fast breakdown leaves having the least retentive capacity compared to the addition of slow and mixed leaf species (Fig.…”
Section: Cpom and Fpom Standing Cropmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Previous wood removal manipulations in headwater streams in which all wood (large and small) was removed, resulted in immediate declines in standing crops of CBOM (Bilby andLikens 1980, Angermeier andKarr 1984) and increased export of inorganic particles (Bilby 1981, Díez et al 2000, FPOM, and CPOM (Bilby and Likens 1980). In Virginia, a five-fold increase in the number of debris dams in a lowgradient headwater stream resulted in 6-113 increases in organic matter storage (Smock et al 1989).…”
Section: Importance Of Allochthonous Subsidies On Abiotic Ecosystem Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, when retention structures are submerged or carried downstream, it will result in greater loss of sediments (Díez et al, 2000;Afonso and Henry, 2002). Therefore, when litter input peaks coincide with low flows, CPOM tends to accumulate in the stream bed .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this was too difficult in the present experiments because the particles were small and the stream channel too complex to locate all the particles without disturbing or dislodging other particles, or disturbing the stream before subsequent releases. Therefore, I modeled retention based on the negative exponential decay equation using the number of released particles and the number of collected particles at the end of the measured stretch of stream, which is commonly done (Diez et al, 2000;Erman and Lamberti, 1992;Speaker et al, 1984). The negative exponential model is P d = P 0 e −kd , where P d is the number of chips caught in the screen, P 0 the number of chips released, −k the slope or instantaneous retention rate, and d the length of the experimental stream reach (5 m).…”
Section: Study Area and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large woody debris increases surface area that physically traps particulate matter (Diez et al, 2000), and is a major retention structure in smaller-order streams (Allan, 1995). Non-woody vegetation may be equally important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%