1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00052-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of removal of surface collagen fibrils on resin–dentin bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
127
1
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
127
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This failure primarily accounted where demineralized collagen fibrils were exposed and the resin failed to envelop the collagen network, properly (Prati et al, 1999;Toledano et al, 2006). The increase in the percentage of adhesive failures may be interpreted as a result of the strengthening of the resin-dentin interface from remineralization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure primarily accounted where demineralized collagen fibrils were exposed and the resin failed to envelop the collagen network, properly (Prati et al, 1999;Toledano et al, 2006). The increase in the percentage of adhesive failures may be interpreted as a result of the strengthening of the resin-dentin interface from remineralization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published data are from in vitro studies that used different methodologies (for example, type of NaOCl, application time and technique, type of adhesive). 7,[13][14]17 The evidence of reflectance FTIR microspectroscopy and tapping mode atomic force microscopy suggest that NaOCl treatment of acid-etched dentin reduces the surface organic matrix but does not affect carbonates and phosphates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,19,40 Perdigão et al, 17 Saboia et al 19 and Prati et al 40 showed that using sodium hypochlorite for removal of organic materials from demineralized dentin before the application of Single Bond (water/alcohol-based( significantly decreases the shear bond strength. This lower strength is probably due to the slower diffusion of alcoholic solvents compared to acetone solvents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 The insignificant difference between groups regarding shear bond strength in the current study, despite using one-step-plus acetone bonding compared to other acetone bondings can be explained as following: acidic monomers in the bonding systems with low pH (e.g. Prime & Bond 2-1( may re-etch the inorganic phase of dentin surface which is free from collagen in the depth of 0.3-0.5 µm, so a hybrid layer may be created, which is enough for a high bond strength, 40,44 One-Step Plus bonding is mildly acidic (pH = 4-5( to re-etch deproteinized dentin surface. On the other hand, pH can affect polymerization as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%