Effect of Remineralizing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets—In Vitro Study

Muntean, Alexandrina; Dârgău, Cristina-Maria; Păcurar, Mariana; Neagoe, Simina; Delean, Ada Gabriela

doi:10.3390/children10020268

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 19 , 20 ] However, the research findings in practice found that remineralization product application (toothpaste and tooth gel) has no influence on micro-SBS which is in accordance with the results stated by other studies. [ 26 , 27 , 28 ] In fact, Fluoride at low concentrations has been proven to promote remineralization across orthodontic brackets with an unimportant effect on SBS. [ 29 , 30 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Preventive Dental Products on Bonding Force: An in vitro Study

Crowley,

Abdulhameed,

Al-Obaidi

et al. 2024

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Testing the effect of Fluoride, chlorhexidine, and molecular iodine applications on the mean micro-shear bond strength (SBS) of enamel in an attempt to preserve enamel integrity during the bonding process. Materials and Methods: The study was an observational case–control one in which 150 human teeth were classified into 10 groups according to the product kind and the prescribed treatment. Each group consisted of 15 teeth. Group C was the control group. Groups FP, FV, and OS utilized products that could be utilized in a professional dental setting. Group FP was treated with 1.23% NaF prophy paste, Group FV was treated with 5% NaF varnish, and Group OS was treated with Opal® Seal Fluoride releasing primer and sealant. Groups L, LF, CHX, and I were treated with mouth rinses. Group L was treated with Listerine Zero Fluoride-Free Mouthwash, Group LF with Listerine Zero 0.02% NaF Mouth Rinse, Group CHX with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, and Group I with ioRinse RTU 100 ppm molecular iodine rinse. Groups TP and G utilized alternative remineralization products. Group TP was treated with Fluoro Calcium Phosphosilicate bioglass containing toothpaste, and Group G was treated with Curodont Protect remineralizing tooth gel. One-way ANOVA test was utilized to perform all statistical analysis in this study. Results: For mean micro-SBS, no significant difference (P > 0.05) between any of the experimental groups was observed when compared to the control group. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between Opal Seal versus Listerine Total, Opal Seal versus Peridex, Listerine versus Listerine Total, and Listerine versus Peridex. All other experimental group comparisons revealed a nonsignificant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions: As the null hypothesis (H0) assumes that changes observed in an experiment are due to chance, hence, the outcomes of this study are coherent with (H0) since the aforementioned application methods did not significantly impact the SBS of orthodontic resin cement to enamel.

show abstract