2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of reference point selection on microscopic stress measurement using EBSD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the results document the magnitude of heterogeneity in both elastic strain and residual stress. We follow the approach of Jiang et al () and Mikami et al () by subtracting the mean of each component of the stress heterogeneities from the measured stress state at each point (i.e., normalizing the mean of each stress component to zero). This recasts the results as stress heterogeneities relative to the mean stress state in each map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the results document the magnitude of heterogeneity in both elastic strain and residual stress. We follow the approach of Jiang et al () and Mikami et al () by subtracting the mean of each component of the stress heterogeneities from the measured stress state at each point (i.e., normalizing the mean of each stress component to zero). This recasts the results as stress heterogeneities relative to the mean stress state in each map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain size data were estimated using a grain tolerance angle of 5° and the minimum grain size was chosen as 2 pixels. All datum points with a confidence index (CI that quantifies the reliability of the indexed pattern) lower than 0.05 were excluded from the measurements [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In deformed geological materials the strain state at the reference point is typically unknown, and it is likely that there are few or no areas that are free from elastic strain. However, strains and stresses can be readily recalculated relative to the mean strain and stress state within each grain area, which is a more intuitive form to interpret and is independent of the choice of reference point (Jiang et al, 2013b;Mikami et al, 2015;. Similarly, GND density estimates are independent of the choice of reference point as they are calculated from the spatial gradients of the rotation fields.…”
Section: 1029/2019jb017867mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6d demonstrates that the intragranular stress heterogeneities calculated from the strains after pattern remapping and the second pass of cross correlation generally still have magnitudes on the order of 1 GPa. In Figure 6e, these stresses have been recalculated by subtracting the mean value within each grain area to remove the effect of the choice of reference points (Jiang et al, 2013b;Mikami et al, 2015;. The result gives the intragranular stress heterogeneities relative to the (unknown) mean stress state within each grain area.…”
Section: 1029/2019jb017867mentioning
confidence: 99%