2013
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2013.2182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of rearing temperature and hormone treatment on sex ratio, survival and body weight of Oreochromis niloticus fry

Abstract: The present experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of rearing water temperature in combination with or without hormone application on masculinization of newly hatched O. niloticus fry. Nile tilapia fry (0.025 g) were reared in three levels of temperature 25, 30 and 35°C and in each rearing temperature fry were fed diet with or without supplementation of 60 mg 17α-methyltestosterone (MT) for 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. O. niloticus fry fed diet without MT and reared at different water temperature 25, 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water quality during the course of the experiment was within the recommended parameters for Tilapia species as suggested by Philippart and Ruwet, 1982;Azaza et al, 2008 andSoltan et al, 2013. No statistical difference was observed in average water temperatures between all treatment groups (p>0.05) which were all around 28 °C (Table 2). Dissolved oxygen (Table 2) stayed within acceptable limits as well (DO-4 mg/L or higher) as per the recommendations of Azim and Little, 2008;Iwama et al, 1997 andRappaport et al, 1976.…”
Section: Histological Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Water quality during the course of the experiment was within the recommended parameters for Tilapia species as suggested by Philippart and Ruwet, 1982;Azaza et al, 2008 andSoltan et al, 2013. No statistical difference was observed in average water temperatures between all treatment groups (p>0.05) which were all around 28 °C (Table 2). Dissolved oxygen (Table 2) stayed within acceptable limits as well (DO-4 mg/L or higher) as per the recommendations of Azim and Little, 2008;Iwama et al, 1997 andRappaport et al, 1976.…”
Section: Histological Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%