2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsc.0000040087.37727.cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of rare-earth oxides on fracture properties of ceria ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be seen in Table 4, E 0 of all samples were calculated to avoid the effect of porosity. Elastic modulus of pure ceria is higher than doped ceria samples, which confirmed the previous reports on Y-, Sm-and Gd-doped ceria [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it can be seen in Table 4, E 0 of all samples were calculated to avoid the effect of porosity. Elastic modulus of pure ceria is higher than doped ceria samples, which confirmed the previous reports on Y-, Sm-and Gd-doped ceria [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…7. All doped ceria samples showed higher hardness than pure ceria, which is in agreement with the reported results in literature [29]. EDC sample demonstrated the highest hardness that could be related to improving the atomic bonds by doping ceria with Er as it was seen in elastic modulus measurement earlier and YDC samples has the lowest hardness among doped ceria samples, which could attributed to lower density due to having high porosity [15,19].…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This difference is related to be the effects of porosity and possibly experimental errors. However, the bulk elastic modulus results measured by bending tests of this work are comparable to the literature reported bending modulus values for both ceria and GDC 34 .…”
Section: Elastic Modulus: Polycrystallinesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Young's modulus obtained from these calculations is 221.8 GPa on the [001] axis and the experimental Young's modulus is 175 GPa. 42 These values are similar. In this model, a crystalline material with no faults, such as grain boundaries or cracks, is used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A fracture strength of 22.7 GPa is obtained from the DFT calculation, whereas the experimental value is 0.250 GPa. 42 The mechanical properties generally depend on factors such as the grain size, defects, flaws, cracks, voids, and grain boundaries. These factors are affected by experimental preparation techniques, thus it is difficult to directly compare calculated and experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%