Abstract:Pressure waves from Ho:YAG lithotripsy are less than with other modalities, yet some retropulsion occurs. The duration of the laser pulse can influence shockwave generation and object migration. Longer pulse width results in less object movement after one shock and more energy delivery during repetitive shocks. Clinically, this regimen may reduce the need for fiber readjustment and lead to more efficient stone fragmentation.
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24] The bubbles are larger than the fiber diameter and can extend from the fiber tip up to ∼2 mm depending on pulse rate and energy. The mechanical shockwaves created by the cavitation bubbles are not a major contributor to stone fragmentation at the 500-μs pulse duration used in this study, because the ablation mechanism is predominantly photothermal.…”
Section: Retropulsion and Flow Velocimetrymentioning
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24] The bubbles are larger than the fiber diameter and can extend from the fiber tip up to ∼2 mm depending on pulse rate and energy. The mechanical shockwaves created by the cavitation bubbles are not a major contributor to stone fragmentation at the 500-μs pulse duration used in this study, because the ablation mechanism is predominantly photothermal.…”
Section: Retropulsion and Flow Velocimetrymentioning
“…13,14 Furthermore, recent Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy retropulsion studies have concluded that the use of lower pulse energies, longer pulse durations, higher pulse rates, and smaller optical fiber diameters is the optimal combination of laser parameters for minimizing stone retropulsion. [15][16][17][18][19][20] A comprehensive study of all of these parameters was beyond the scope of this paper. However, it should be emphasized that, unlike the flashlamppumped Ho:YAG laser, the diode-pumped TFL is an ideal laser for operation within the range of laser parameters listed above, due to the TFL's excellent spatial beam profile that allows use of small-core fiber diameters and its operation at arbitrary pulse durations and pulse rates.…”
Abstract. The holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but efficient operation is limited to low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the thulium fiber laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate efficiently at high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion for the two different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ = 1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5 to 35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10 to 400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ = 2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30 to 550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and a pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through 200-and 270-μm-core optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 and 20.8 J/cm 2 , respectively. Stone retropulsion with the Ho:YAG laser linearly increased with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates less than 150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies less than 175 mJ at 10 Hz and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies of 100 to 200 mJ and high pulse rates of 100 to 150 Hz may also provide an alternative to the Ho:YAG laser for higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not a primary concern.C 2011 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
“…Previous Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy retropulsion studies also have reported that the use of lower pulse energies, longer pulse durations, higher pulse rates, and smaller optical fiber diameters is the optimal combination of laser parameters for minimizing stone retropulsion. [17][18][19][20][21][22] The TFL technology is ideally suited for operation with this combination of laser parameters.…”
Section: Stone Phantom Retropulsion Studiesmentioning
Abstract. The thulium fiber laser (TFL) is currently being studied as an alternative to the conventional holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser for lithotripsy. The diode-pumped TFL may be electronically modulated to operate with variable parameters (e.g., pulse rate, pulse duration, and duty cycle) for studying the influence of pulse train mode on stone ablation rates. The TFL under study was operated at 1908 nm, 35-mJ pulse energy, and 500-μs pulse duration, in a train of 5 micro-pulses, with macro-pulse rates of 10 Hz, compared with conventional TFL operation at 10 to 50 Hz. TFL energy was delivered through 100-μm-core fibers in contact with human uric acid (UA) and calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones. Mass removal rates, optical coherence tomography, and light microscopy were used to analyze the ablation craters. Stone retropulsion and fiber tip degradation studies also were conducted for these laser parameters. TFL operation in micro-pulse train (MPT) mode resulted in a factor of two increase in the ablation rate of 414 AE 94 μg∕s and 122 AE 24 μg∕s for the UA and COM stones, respectively, compared to 182 AE 69 μg∕s and 60 AE 14 μg∕s with standard pulse trains delivered at 50 Hz (P < 0.05). Stone retropulsion remained minimal (<2 mm after 1200 pulses) for both pulse modes. Fiber burnback was significant for both pulse modes and was higher for COM stones than UA stones. TFL operation in MPT mode results in increased stone ablation rates which, with further optimization, may approach levels comparable to Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in the clinic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.