2017
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa76ad
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of proton irradiation on the fluctuation-induced magnetoconductivity of FeSe1−xTexthin films

Abstract: The influence of proton irradiation on the fluctuation-induced magnetoconductivity of high quality FeSe 1−x Te x (x = 0.4, 0.55) (FST) thin films has been investigated. The measurements were performed with magnetic fields up to 13 T applied in the two main crystal directions. The results were interpreted in terms of the Ginzburg-Landau approach for three-dimensional materials under a total-energy cutoff. The analysis shows that properly-tuned proton irradiation does not appreciably affect fundamental supercond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a more extended investigation carried out on heavy-ion irradiated FeSe0.4Te0.6 single crystals yielded to not systematic and not reproducible results on superconducting properties [12], even if a significant effect in terms of vortex-pinning enhancement on FeSe0.45Te0.55 crystals has been proven on the atomic scale [13]. Recently, on the contrary, Fe(Se,Te) thin films grown on CaF2 were reported to show a decrease in Tc up to 7 K upon irradiation with 3.5 MeV protons [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, a more extended investigation carried out on heavy-ion irradiated FeSe0.4Te0.6 single crystals yielded to not systematic and not reproducible results on superconducting properties [12], even if a significant effect in terms of vortex-pinning enhancement on FeSe0.45Te0.55 crystals has been proven on the atomic scale [13]. Recently, on the contrary, Fe(Se,Te) thin films grown on CaF2 were reported to show a decrease in Tc up to 7 K upon irradiation with 3.5 MeV protons [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This background resistivity was determined by a linear fit to the resistivity above 35 K (i.e., above 1.5T c ) where fluctuation effects are expected to be negligible. [27][28][29][30][31] Some examples of this procedure for different field amplitudes and orientations are presented in Figs. 2a-c.…”
Section: Determination Of the Normal State Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in what follows we have set c = 0.3, a value that is close to the one found in other FeSC. [27][28][29][30][31] In the zero-field limit (for h ≪ ε), and in the absence of cutoff (c → ∞), equation (3) reduces to the well known Aslamazov-Larkin expression, ∆σ (ε) = e 2 /32hξ c (0)ε 1/2 .…”
Section: Determination Of the Normal State Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 The formation of a cascade 16 or point defect 21 by ion irradiation also induces deformation of a lattice with a nanoscale defect. In FST thin films, provided that not only large-scale and excessive amounts of defects can degrade the entire superconducting matrix in FST thin films, 22 but also FST has a short coherence length (~2 nm), 23 the formation of minimal size defects for inducing nanostrain is required to prevent Cooper pair breaking while improving Jc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%