2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of prosthetic alignment on gait and biomechanical loading in individuals with transfemoral amputation: A preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results may correspond to a reduced lateral GRF peak during the single-support phase of gait and lack of the double-peak in the medial GRF profile from the affected limb. Previous studies found similar differences between the affected and unaffected limbs (Soares et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019). These characteristics are possibly related to COM acceleration, which represents the effect of GRF generation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results may correspond to a reduced lateral GRF peak during the single-support phase of gait and lack of the double-peak in the medial GRF profile from the affected limb. Previous studies found similar differences between the affected and unaffected limbs (Soares et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019). These characteristics are possibly related to COM acceleration, which represents the effect of GRF generation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As the stance time of the affected limb has been reported to be shorter than that of the unaffected limb (Nolan et al, 2003;Hof et al, 2007;Schaarschmidt et al, 2012;Mahon et al, 2017), we hypothesize that the mean mediolateral GRF of the affected limb is higher than that of the unaffected limb. UAK prosthesis users demonstrated a unimodal mediolateral GRF-time curve in the affected limb, while a bimodal in the unaffected limb in a previous study (Zhang et al, 2019). Thus, we hypothesize that the affected limb generates higher mean mediolateral GRF than the unaffected limb, especially at midstance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The changes in Fx, Fy1 and Fy2 for prosthetic and intact limbs as well as in their asymmetry ratios between TFSim and TFAmp groups might be supported by previous studies that reported similar changes across walking speeds [25,40]. Similar asymmetry patterns of mediolateral GRF in the TFSim and TFAmp groups were revealed in a study that compared individuals with unilateral TFAmp and non-disabled individuals [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A study that was done in able-bodied individuals also found correlations between higher GRFs and stress fractures [22]. Although there may be a variety of factors such as prosthetic components [54,55], physical conditions [56,57], and other gait parameters such as velocity and motor control [54,58] that can affect GRFs and GRIs on individuals with amputation, our results indicate that increasing step frequency is a viable strategy to reduce GRFs or GRIs. Therefore, reduction of GRFs or GRIs by increasing step frequency may have implications to reduce potential injury risk during running in individuals with amputation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%