2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of processing conditions on crystallization kinetics during materials extrusion additive manufacturing

Abstract: Material extrusion additive manufacturing processes force molten polymer through a printer nozzle at high (> 100 s−1) wall shear rates prior to cooling and crystallization. These high shear rates can lead to flow-induced crystallization in common polymer processing techniques, but the magnitude and importance of this effect is unknown for additive manufacturing. A significant barrier to understanding this process is the lack of in situ measurement techniques to quantify crystallinity after polymer filament ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
83
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the numerous printing parameters, optimal printing conditions are challenging and may require several iterations of trial and error corrections before printing appropriately [10,16], especially when the polymer is semi-crystalline. Many polymers used for FFF are semi-crystalline, such as polylactic acid (PLA) [17,18], polycaprolactone (PCL) [19], polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) [20], polyethylene (PE) [21] and polypropylene (PP) [22]. Although a wide range of polymer filaments are commercially available for FFF, PLA is the most popular one due to its degradability and availability in various colors and textures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the numerous printing parameters, optimal printing conditions are challenging and may require several iterations of trial and error corrections before printing appropriately [10,16], especially when the polymer is semi-crystalline. Many polymers used for FFF are semi-crystalline, such as polylactic acid (PLA) [17,18], polycaprolactone (PCL) [19], polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) [20], polyethylene (PE) [21] and polypropylene (PP) [22]. Although a wide range of polymer filaments are commercially available for FFF, PLA is the most popular one due to its degradability and availability in various colors and textures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the development of interlayer strength and crystallization will become time-dependent [26,27]. Thermal monitoring of the FFF process to extract the non-isothermal temperature profile of a printed layer has been extensively reported in the literature, either by utilizing a thermocouple [28][29][30] or through infrared (IR) thermography [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Other authors have successfully attempted to model the temperature profiles within consecutively deposited layers [32,[39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having characterized the crystallization behavior of the materials under isothermal and nonisothermal processing conditions, the work focused on determining the thermal history of the material during the deposition process. Several previous works have already proposed set-ups able to measure the thermal profile of the material during the deposition process, for example by IR thermography or fine thermocouples [19,30]. The printed geometry is the same as previously The large difference in crystallizability of the two materials, as evidenced by isothermal and non-isothermal measurements, might result in different welding performance during printing.…”
Section: In-situ Temperature Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%