2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of process parameters on bitumen emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emulsions produced at 14000 rpm showed a greater polydispersity than at 22000 rpm (Figure 6), which may be related to the non-uniformity of shear distribution within the emulsion due to the high viscosity of the continuous phase. On the other hand, the higher rotation velocity promoted the decrease of d 32 (Figure 6), validating a well-known trend for emulsions (Gingras et al, 2005;Darine et al, 2011). The rotation speed showed little influence on the viscosity of the emulsions (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Emulsions produced at 14000 rpm showed a greater polydispersity than at 22000 rpm (Figure 6), which may be related to the non-uniformity of shear distribution within the emulsion due to the high viscosity of the continuous phase. On the other hand, the higher rotation velocity promoted the decrease of d 32 (Figure 6), validating a well-known trend for emulsions (Gingras et al, 2005;Darine et al, 2011). The rotation speed showed little influence on the viscosity of the emulsions (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In-line rotor-stator studies on emulsification are scarce but include work by Averbukh et al (1988) and more recently by Thapar (2004) and Gingras et al (2005). Averbukh et al (1988) provides an expression correlating drop size with various terms such as dispersed phase volume fraction, interfacial tension, flow rate, shear gap, continuous phase viscosity and rotor speed; however, a description of this study is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The optimal formulation contains a first small size of about 1 µm and a second size of about 5 µm with a proportion of are obtained and emulsions have no storage stability. Moreover, the droplet size obtained by the traditional method is between 5-10 microns; small droplet sizes are very difficult to obtain [18,19]. Obviously, we could consider that the size of 5-10 microns is a small droplet size, but in this paper, we will further differentiate the necessity of different sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%