2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Process Parameters on Melt Pool Geometry in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Metals: A Numerical Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Simulation domain is 2D 2) Heat source is volumetric and obeys the Beer-Lambert law 3) Laser moves with a constant speed 4) Flow of the molten material is incompressible 5) Gas phase and evaporation are not considered 6) All powder grains are spherical (i.e., circular in 2D) A brief description of the process simulator's main melt pool simulation and powder layer generation modules is presented next. A detailed description of the predictive capabilities and experimental validation of our SPH-based LPBF model for 2D and 3D single-track applications is available in [37], [39], [40].…”
Section: High-fidelity Multi-layer Lpbf Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Simulation domain is 2D 2) Heat source is volumetric and obeys the Beer-Lambert law 3) Laser moves with a constant speed 4) Flow of the molten material is incompressible 5) Gas phase and evaporation are not considered 6) All powder grains are spherical (i.e., circular in 2D) A brief description of the process simulator's main melt pool simulation and powder layer generation modules is presented next. A detailed description of the predictive capabilities and experimental validation of our SPH-based LPBF model for 2D and 3D single-track applications is available in [37], [39], [40].…”
Section: High-fidelity Multi-layer Lpbf Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPH method can be divided into the Weakly-Compressible SPH (WCSPH) and the Incompressible SPH (ISPH) method. In the current state of the art, both methods demonstrate promising results in the application to laser material processing as shown in [1,2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%