Effect of Process Parameters on the Generated Surface Roughness of Down-Facing Surfaces in Selective Laser Melting

Abstract

Additive manufacturing provides a number of benefits in terms of infinite freedom to design complex parts and reduced lead-times while globally reducing the size of supply chains as it brings all production processes under one roof. However, additive manufacturing (AM) lags far behind conventional manufacturing in terms of surface quality. This proves a hindrance for many companies considering investment in AM. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of varying process parameters on the resultant roughness of the down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting (SLM). A systematic experimental study was carried out and the effects of the interaction of the different parameters and their effect on the surface roughness (Sa) were analyzed. It was found that the interaction and interdependency between parameters were of greatest significance to the obtainable surface roughness, though their effects vary greatly depending on the applied levels. This behavior was mainly attributed to the difference in energy absorbed by the powder. Predictive process models for optimization of process parameters for minimizing the obtained Sa in 45° and 35° down-facing surface, individually, were achieved with average error percentages of 5% and 6.3%, respectively, however further investigation is still warranted.

Fast Detection of Heat Accumulation in Powder Bed Fusion Using Computationally Efficient Thermal Models

“…For example, Mertens et al [ 3 ] investigated the defect of dross formation where an enlarged melt pool caused by local overheating leads to undesired sintering of loose powder in its vicinity. Charles et al [ 7 ] also studied dross formation by investigating the correlation between process parameters, e.g., laser power, scan speed and the resulting surface roughness. High process temperatures along with the effect of surface tension lead to the defect of melt ball formation [ 8 ].…”

Experiment-Based Process Modeling and Optimization for High-Quality and Resource-Efficient FFF 3D Printing

“…In contrast to subtractive manufacturing methods, additive manufacturing (AM, also known as 3D printing) produces components and parts by adding material layer-upon-layer of a predefined thickness. AM offers increased design freedom, lead-time reductions, and the possibility of functional integration, with AM technologies being increasingly adopted and developed by industry, resulting in more varied and affordable processes, accompanied by greater market acceptance and penetration [1][2][3]. In particular, 3D printing has become a viable alternative to conventional manufacturing processes in numerous applications, i.e., in the automobile, aerospace, medical, and construction industries and widely in furniture production [4][5][6][7].…”

Special Issue on “Micro/Nano Manufacturing”

“…The Special Issue contains 13 papers covering the topics listed above [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The treated micro fabrication technologies range from established processes like elliptical vibration cutting to novel process chains such as the formation of nanoparticle arrays by hot embossing and sputtering.…”