2016
DOI: 10.15623/ijret.2016.0518007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Process Parameters on Temperature Distribution, Strain Rate and Flow-Stress During Friction Stir Welding of Aluminium Alloy

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5a represents the friction area of each tool pin, already shown in Table 3, while Figure 5b shows the cross-section area of the stir zone for dissimilar welds. The higher friction area between the progressive pin tools and the material to weld (Figure 5a) promoted an increase of the heat-input during welding, which reduced the flow stress of the material, as Siddiqui et al [27] mentioned. Although the lower flow stress was expected to decrease the torque, progressive pin tools provided an increase in the amount of material dragged by the tool at each revolution, as the tools' pin volumes suggest (Table 3) and the weld's cross sections in Figure 5b show, and therefore the torque increased.…”
Section: Welding Torque and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 5a represents the friction area of each tool pin, already shown in Table 3, while Figure 5b shows the cross-section area of the stir zone for dissimilar welds. The higher friction area between the progressive pin tools and the material to weld (Figure 5a) promoted an increase of the heat-input during welding, which reduced the flow stress of the material, as Siddiqui et al [27] mentioned. Although the lower flow stress was expected to decrease the torque, progressive pin tools provided an increase in the amount of material dragged by the tool at each revolution, as the tools' pin volumes suggest (Table 3) and the weld's cross sections in Figure 5b show, and therefore the torque increased.…”
Section: Welding Torque and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the current study, as the diameter of the shoulder of all the tools was approximately the same, the difference in the friction area between the tools came from the pin area. Figure5arepresents the friction area of each tool pin, already shown in Table3, while Figure5bshows the cross-section area of the stir zone for dissimilar welds.The higher friction area between the progressive pin tools and the material to weld (Figure5a) promoted an increase of the heat-input during welding, which reduced the flow stress of the material, as Siddiqui et al[27] mentioned. Although the lower flow stress was expected to decrease the torque, progressive pin tools provided an increase in the amount of material dragged by the tool at each revolution, as the tools' pin volumes suggest (Table3) and the weld's cross sections in Figure5bshow, and therefore the torque increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%