2017
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of privatized managed care on public insurance spending and generosity: Evidence from Medicaid

Abstract: States choose to provide Medicaid coverage via managed care or traditional fee-for-service. Managed care provided by private insurers poses higher contracting costs and information asymmetry than traditional fee-for-service but potentially improves efficiency and reduces spending. Evaluating the effect of managed care on Medicaid spending is challenging because adoption of managed care is nonrandom and may be driven by local economic shocks that simultaneously affect Medicaid spending. This study implements a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, CBH's incentives are aligned with DBHIDS's imperative to improve the quality of behavioral health services while ensuring the financial viability of implementation initiatives. This is unlike other cities and states in the United States, which have delegated Medicaid management to several commercial insurers ( Perez, 2018 ). The increased fragmentation and insurers’ focus on cost reduction in other city and state Medicaid systems make the kind of coordination and resource investments that were necessary in PACTS more challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, CBH's incentives are aligned with DBHIDS's imperative to improve the quality of behavioral health services while ensuring the financial viability of implementation initiatives. This is unlike other cities and states in the United States, which have delegated Medicaid management to several commercial insurers ( Perez, 2018 ). The increased fragmentation and insurers’ focus on cost reduction in other city and state Medicaid systems make the kind of coordination and resource investments that were necessary in PACTS more challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information Asymmetry between Managed Care Organizations and Providers: Implications for Healthcare Fraud in the USA There are complex and diverse relationships between healthcare fraud and information asymmetry among healthcare providers in the U.S. Information asymmetry occurs when one side of a transaction or connection has more information than the other, and it can lead to opportunities for exploitation or unethical behavior (Capelleveen et al, 2016;Perez, 2017).…”
Section: Impacts Of Information Asymmetry and Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recent studies have typically found that shifting Medicaid recipients away from government‐administered plans and into the responsibility of private insurers does not reduce spending or budget variability, on average—and may even lead to higher spending in some contexts (Perez, 2018a; Burns, 2009; Duggan and Hayford, 2013; Duggan, 2004). However, other work shows meaningful savings from managed care use, perhaps as much as 3% lower state Medicaid spending for every 10% increase in MCO enrollment (Perez, 2018b). Additionally, Marton, Yelowitz, and Talbert (2014) find that the design of these managed care plans plays a crucial role in restraining service utilization and reducing costs, at least for children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%