2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of printed circuit heat exchanger’s different designs on the performance of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For PCHEs with continuous flow channels, it can be found that PCHEs with straight channels have the smallest heat transfer capacity and the lowest pressure drop. The heat transfer performance of PCHEs with zigzag channels is significantly better than that with straight channels at the cost of larger pressure drop (Meshram et al, 2016;Saeed et al, 2020b). PCHEs with continuous flow channels including both straight and zigzag channels have high maturity level and low manufacturing cost.…”
Section: Structure Design Criteria Of Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PCHEs with continuous flow channels, it can be found that PCHEs with straight channels have the smallest heat transfer capacity and the lowest pressure drop. The heat transfer performance of PCHEs with zigzag channels is significantly better than that with straight channels at the cost of larger pressure drop (Meshram et al, 2016;Saeed et al, 2020b). PCHEs with continuous flow channels including both straight and zigzag channels have high maturity level and low manufacturing cost.…”
Section: Structure Design Criteria Of Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh of the rotor and nozzle guide vane is show in Figure 6. Mesh in the boundary layer region was generated using the guidelines that can be found in previous work of the authors [30,31]. To find the optimized mesh size and node distribution, four, namely M1, M2, M3, and M4, generated details on which are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Cfd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the available Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models, there are two classifications of turbulence models that have been employed in the literature depending on how the boundary layer is considered in those models [16][17][18]. In the first category of the RANS model, the flow in the boundary layer is not computed.…”
Section: Computational Model 21 Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%