2006
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02044-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Primer Selection on Estimates of GB Virus C (GBV-C) Prevalence and Response to Antiretroviral Therapy for Optimal Testing for GBV-C Viremia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Primer selection is a key point in the development of successful PCR strategies. Authors comparing genomic regions and different primers among the same target gene in the GBV-C genome concluded that the 5'UTR is the most stable and conserved region and in addition provided a valuable suggestion of "best primers" 1,3,18 . The TaqMan assay here described achieved the same sensitivity as a nested-PCR proposed by ANDONOV et al 1 , in a more convenient and automated format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primer selection is a key point in the development of successful PCR strategies. Authors comparing genomic regions and different primers among the same target gene in the GBV-C genome concluded that the 5'UTR is the most stable and conserved region and in addition provided a valuable suggestion of "best primers" 1,3,18 . The TaqMan assay here described achieved the same sensitivity as a nested-PCR proposed by ANDONOV et al 1 , in a more convenient and automated format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences among the studies could be due to several reasons, including the fact that GBV-C testing is not standardized and each study used a different primer for a qualitative test. A recent study [35] indicates that the sensitivity and specificity of each test vary and that the sensitivity of one particular test depends on GBV-C RNA levels. This motivates the need for an analysis that has the ability to account for the possibly differing effects of GBV-C infection within each population.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results can also be compared to the 10% infection rate reported in Brazil, and the 14.6% found in Bolivia [9,22] . Differences in the stated infection rates can be interpreted in many ways: the number of blood samples tested, method of detection used (antibody vs. PCR), and region amplified by PCR and primers used [6,20,23] . Also, geographic backgrounds of individuals tested, and the skills of technicians are other methods of interpretation [24,25] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%