1986
DOI: 10.3354/meps034011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of prey abundance and size on the growth and survival of larval fish: an experimental study employing large volume enclosures

Abstract: We examined the effect of natural variations in the concentration and size composition of plankton in coastal waters on the growth and survival of recently hatched larval capelin Mallotus villosus. Known numbers of larvae were stocked into 4 m3 j n sjtu enclosures, containing plankton communities whose size composihon and total particle concentration mirrored those occurnng naturally dunng times when the nearshore waters were alternately dominated by deep upwelled waters, and by warmer surface waters. Daily gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Cowan & Houde (1990) observed mean daily specific growth and mortality rates of 0.20 and 0.15, respectively for bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli larvae held in mesocosms suspended on a floating platform in Chesapeake Bay. Growth rates of capelin Mallotus villosus larvae reared in enclosures at ambient conditions in the Gulf of St. Lawrence were similar to those estimated for natural populations (Frank & Leggett 1986). The highest mean growth rate in the present study (G = 0.143) was less than estimated field growth rates (Kneib 1987) and only half that of F. heteroclitus larvae reared in the laboratory on an unrestricted ration (Kneib & Parker 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Cowan & Houde (1990) observed mean daily specific growth and mortality rates of 0.20 and 0.15, respectively for bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli larvae held in mesocosms suspended on a floating platform in Chesapeake Bay. Growth rates of capelin Mallotus villosus larvae reared in enclosures at ambient conditions in the Gulf of St. Lawrence were similar to those estimated for natural populations (Frank & Leggett 1986). The highest mean growth rate in the present study (G = 0.143) was less than estimated field growth rates (Kneib 1987) and only half that of F. heteroclitus larvae reared in the laboratory on an unrestricted ration (Kneib & Parker 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…However, unlike natural cohorts of F. heteroclitus larvae, in which usually fewer than 5% survived for 3 d after hatching (author's unpubl, data), mortality within the experimental cohorts was low and 20 to 90 % of the larvae survived for 2 wk in the enclosures. The high survival of larvae in this experiment was probably due to the exclusion of predators because mortality rates of fish larvae in enclosure experiments often are very sensitive to the presence or absence of predators (0iestad 1982, Frank & Leggett 1986, Cowan & Houde 1990. Because of the low mortality in enclosed cohorts, the larvae in this experiment probably were maintained at densities higher than those experienced in the natural population, even though initial stocking density was low relative to many natural peaks in hatchling density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although we recognize that zooplankton biomass is an imperfect measure of larval fish food (Frank & Leggett 1986, Frank 1988, zooplankton concentrations in the frontal waters probably act to promote the cooccurring high ichthyoplankton concentrations. Some larval and small juvenile fishes found in the same neuston samples (e. g. Caranx crysos, Thunnus atlanticus, T. albacares, and Euthynnus alletteratus 5 20 mm SL) utilize macrozooplankton as prey (Finucane et al in press, Naughton et al unpubl.).…”
Section: Ichthyoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the numerous theories relating food availability, larval survival and herring recruitment, evidence from nature of food limitation and its possible effects on fish larval growth and survival is limited (e.g. Frank & Leggett 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%