2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of prewetting methods on some fresh and hardened properties of concrete with pumice aggregate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural lightweight concretes from Yamanian pumice and scoria using trial mix method with Type II PC content of 500 kg yielded the cube compressive strengths of 29 MPa and 37 MPa [47]. The structural lightweight concrete from Turkish pumice using trial mix method with OPC contents of (320-440) kg and low slump values, ie (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) mm yielded the cylindrical compressive strengths of (19.17-26.09) MPa [34]. Thus it can be showed that structural lightweight concretes obtained from the typical pumice and scoria as coarse aggregates in this study, produced relatively low PPC contents and then they can be more efficient.…”
Section: B MIX Proportions For Structural Lightweight Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structural lightweight concretes from Yamanian pumice and scoria using trial mix method with Type II PC content of 500 kg yielded the cube compressive strengths of 29 MPa and 37 MPa [47]. The structural lightweight concrete from Turkish pumice using trial mix method with OPC contents of (320-440) kg and low slump values, ie (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) mm yielded the cylindrical compressive strengths of (19.17-26.09) MPa [34]. Thus it can be showed that structural lightweight concretes obtained from the typical pumice and scoria as coarse aggregates in this study, produced relatively low PPC contents and then they can be more efficient.…”
Section: B MIX Proportions For Structural Lightweight Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prewetting methods, such as sprinkling, conventional presoaking or vacuum presoaking are used to reduce the high absorption and high absorption rate of coarse aggregates due to its high porosity [24][29] [39]. The use of the chemical water reducer admixture aims to improve the workability at low water-cement ratio in order to the compressive strength remains high [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightweight concrete (LWC) is usually manufactured by adding lightweight aggregates (LWA) into the cementitious matrix. The most widely used LWA are pumice [3], expanded perlite [4][5][6], shale [7][8][9], expanded clay [10], and diatomite [11]. While the incorporation of lightweight materials in cementitious matrix achieves reduced density, traditional LWC and other cementitious composites possess lower mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the different compositional parameters such as types of LWA (fly ash based artificial aggregate, sintering expanded clay, pumice aggregate, or oil palm shell), amount and type of binder, water-to-binder ratio, mineral admixture (silica fume, fly ash), and initial prewetting method for LWA, the shrinkage of LAC may be lower or greater than that of NWC [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Generally, the shrinkage of LACs is reduced by the rigid LWA with higher modulus of elasticity in water saturated condition prewetted and with the greater volume of LWA in the same volume of paste [24][25][26]. And most importantly, in current standard methods, the shrinkage of LAC is usually estimated from the expressions defined for NWC and always gets higher value than those measured in practice [24,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%