2020
DOI: 10.3390/membranes10100249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pretreatment on Hydraulic Performance of the Integrated Membrane Process for Concentrating Nutrient in Biogas Digestate from Swine Manure

Abstract: Nanofiltration (NF) or reverse osmosis (RO) process has been widely applied for concentrating nutrient in biogas digestate. However, efficient pretreatment is key to the sustainable operation of NF or RO. In this study, the combination of NF and RO for concentrating biogas digestate was compared using different pretreatments of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane (HFUFM) and ceramic membrane (CUFM). Pilot-scale batch tests were conducted (500 L). CUFM showed a higher membrane flux than HFUFM (100 ~ 180 L·(m2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality and structure of organic matter in biogas digestates depends on the raw materials for biogas production and the technology applied, and this can affect availability of heavy metals (Törnwall et al 2017;Kupper et al 2014). For example, pig manure contains more potassium (Zhan et al 2020;Guilayn et al 2019), while co-fermented cattle manure increases phosphorus content (Bachmann et al 2011). Thus, digestate (as an organo-mineral fertilizer) can provide the same amount of nutrients as mineral (Riva et al 2016) or organic fertilizers like manure (Alburquerque et al 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and structure of organic matter in biogas digestates depends on the raw materials for biogas production and the technology applied, and this can affect availability of heavy metals (Törnwall et al 2017;Kupper et al 2014). For example, pig manure contains more potassium (Zhan et al 2020;Guilayn et al 2019), while co-fermented cattle manure increases phosphorus content (Bachmann et al 2011). Thus, digestate (as an organo-mineral fertilizer) can provide the same amount of nutrients as mineral (Riva et al 2016) or organic fertilizers like manure (Alburquerque et al 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-or ultrafiltration enables the removal of macromolecules, whereas reverse osmosis enables the separation and concentration of phosphates or other soluble compounds (Camilleri-Rumbau et al, 2021). Combining different membranes has been shown to be favorable in removal of both particle-bound and dissolved phosphorus (Vaneeckhaute et al, 2017;Zacharof et al, 2019;Zhan et al, 2020). Hence, micro-ultra-or nanofiltration has often been combined with reverse osmosis in experimental studies resulting in a set of different retentate fractions (Adam et al, 2018;Camilleri-Rumbau et al, 2021).…”
Section: Membrane Filtration Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks include the high upfront costs [40] and the tendency for membrane fouling and clogging, which can lead to decreased performance and significant operational expenses [41]. Comprehensive exploration has been conducted on a wide range of membrane processes for the treatment of WD: microfiltration [40,42], ultrafiltration [43,44], nanofiltration [45,46], reverse osmosis [45,46], and forward osmosis [41]. However, membrane technology generates a retentate with a higher concentration of pollutants and pathogens compared to the original material that will also need special management before disposal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%