2022
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2022.2122492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pressure on methane hydrate formation in graphite nanofluids in non-stirred system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhai et al reported that adding GNPs under high pressure (7.0 MPa) increased the hydrate formation rate. In addition, the gas uptake upon hydrate formation with GNPs was higher than that with other metal-oxide nanofluids, suggesting that using cost-effective GNPs is a promising option for SNG . The effects of nanoparticle surface modification have also been studied. , Using fluorinated graphite (FG) achieved a CH 4 uptake of 100.9 cm 3 STP/g H 2 O under conditions where uncoated graphite failed to form CH 4 hydrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhai et al reported that adding GNPs under high pressure (7.0 MPa) increased the hydrate formation rate. In addition, the gas uptake upon hydrate formation with GNPs was higher than that with other metal-oxide nanofluids, suggesting that using cost-effective GNPs is a promising option for SNG . The effects of nanoparticle surface modification have also been studied. , Using fluorinated graphite (FG) achieved a CH 4 uptake of 100.9 cm 3 STP/g H 2 O under conditions where uncoated graphite failed to form CH 4 hydrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%