2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2008.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pressure on efficiency of UV curing of CVD-derived low-k material at different wavelengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A YM value as high as 8. 5 GPa is obtained after exposure to 172 nm photons at the expense of significant degradation of the low-k chemical and electrical properties. Preferential etching of the Si-low-k interface by HF is inferred from the decrease of the interfacial adhesion from 3 to 0.5 J/m 2 after HF dip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A YM value as high as 8. 5 GPa is obtained after exposure to 172 nm photons at the expense of significant degradation of the low-k chemical and electrical properties. Preferential etching of the Si-low-k interface by HF is inferred from the decrease of the interfacial adhesion from 3 to 0.5 J/m 2 after HF dip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to exclude the effect of atmospheric gasses on the low-k during the UV-curing the processing chamber was evacuated down to 5 mbar. Next the chamber was flushed with high purity N2 to maintain a pressure of 20 mbar [5]. Afterwards, the temperature was increased from room temperature (RT) to 400°C by a heater element in about 2 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The influence of the UV cure has already been investigated by several authors. [1][2][3][4][5][6] A complete removal of the porogens seemed to be very difficult and the remaining porogens created problems e.g. of high leakage current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can be explained by the fact that the 172 nm photon is energetic enough to break the Si-C band while a 200 nm photon is not, as explained in more detail in ref. 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 However, there is a significant difference in how the irradiation affects these two films. While for MeLK the decrease of the methylene peak can be attributed to a self-hydrophobization process 35 which is also supported by the increased intensity of the bands assigned to Si-O-Si and Si-CH 3 , the decrease of the ethylene peak in EtLK cannot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%