1987
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90309-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pregnancy on gastric motility in vivo and in vitro in the guinea pig

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the stimulation of CCK secretion and gallbladder contraction is supposed to be mediated mainly by food constituents reaching the duodenum, this finding is further corroborated by the similar time course of CCK secretion and gallblad der contraction seen after the ingestion of the test meal. These findings agree with ear lier studies using dye dilution techniques [7] but contrast with those obtained in pregnant animals [4], There seem to be species differ ences, and one possible explanation for these could be that even if raised progesterone lev els in pregnancy will affect gastric smooth muscle in man and mammals, hydrostatic factors might be more important in the erect human being compared to four-footed ani mals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the stimulation of CCK secretion and gallbladder contraction is supposed to be mediated mainly by food constituents reaching the duodenum, this finding is further corroborated by the similar time course of CCK secretion and gallblad der contraction seen after the ingestion of the test meal. These findings agree with ear lier studies using dye dilution techniques [7] but contrast with those obtained in pregnant animals [4], There seem to be species differ ences, and one possible explanation for these could be that even if raised progesterone lev els in pregnancy will affect gastric smooth muscle in man and mammals, hydrostatic factors might be more important in the erect human being compared to four-footed ani mals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It has not been clearly demon strated whether this is due to slow gastric emptying and/or an increased transit time in the small intestine or both. Experimental studies have demonstrated that gastric emptying is delayed in pregnant guinea pigs [4] and rats [5], but results from pregnant women are conflicting. Clark and Seager [6] studied the gastric emptying time by the up take of orally administered paracetamol in water and found that gastric emptying was decreased in women pregnant in the first tri mester.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastrointestinal motility is subject to the influence of sex hormones, as indicated by the presence of gastrooesophageal reflux, prolonged oral-to-caecal transit time and biliary dysfunction during pregnancy [1][2][3], and by the identification of receptors to steroids of ovarian origin in the stomach and gastrointestinal tract of baboons and guinea-pigs [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When gastric emptying was measured via the rate of paracetamol absorption in humans e.g., Whitehead et al (1993) did not find differences in first, second and third trimester pregnant women in comparison to non-pregnant women, while Simpson et al (1988) and Levy et al (1994) reported delayed gastric emptying at 12-14 weeks and 8-12 weeks of gestation, respectively. In guinea pigs, the gastric emptying of liquids was decreased when third trimester pregnant animals were compared to non-pregnant ones (Ryan et al 1987). As far as we know, no experiments on the influence of pregnancy on gastric emptying in rats were reported, Significantly different from the response before L-NAME although delaying influences of sex steroid hormones on gastric emptying in rats have been shown (Chen et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%