Effect of pre-sowing and pre-emergence glyphosate applications on weedsin stale seedbed cotton

Doğan, Mehmet Nedim; Ünay, Aydın; Boz, Özhan; Öğüt, Derya

doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2009.01.013

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In a study conducted with a stale seedbed treatment of glyphosate in Turkey, johnsongrass was successfully controlled [64]. In particular, the cover and biomass of the weed were reduced by 61-75% and 60-69%, respectively after glyphosate application at 2.8 kg a.e./ha [64]. Similar results were also obtained in ongoing stale seedbed field trials in Greece (in soybean and groundnut) by Travlos et al (unpublished data).…”

Section: Chemical Control Of Johnsongrass With Emphasis To Glyphosatesupporting

confidence: 69%

“…Moreover, previous studies have shown that the application of glyphosate with adjuvants after seedhead emergence can significantly reduce S. halepense regrowth [75]. In a study conducted with a stale seedbed treatment of glyphosate in Turkey, johnsongrass was successfully controlled [64]. In particular, the cover and biomass of the weed were reduced by 61-75% and 60-69%, respectively after glyphosate application at 2.8 kg a.e./ha [64].…”

Section: Chemical Control Of Johnsongrass With Emphasis To Glyphosatementioning

confidence: 96%

“…Johnsongrass management in European countries has been mainly based on the POST-emergent application of sulfonylurea and other ALS and ACCase inhibiting herbicides; however, due to the lack of other modes of action and the overuse of herbicides with the same mode of action, herbicide-resistant biotypes have occurred and dramatically increased across Europe [63]. The control of both the seedlings and rhizomes of johnsongrass has been achieved in many crops when sprayed with products containing glyphosate [64]. Globally, many studies have confirmed the high efficacy of glyphosate against S. halepense, which is typically used as a late-summer or fall treatment for postharvest johnsongrass control [65][66][67].…”

Section: Chemical Control Of Johnsongrass With Emphasis To Glyphosatementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Key Aspects on the Biology, Ecology and Impacts of Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers] and the Role of Glyphosate and Non-Chemical Alternative Practices for the Management of This Weed in Europe

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers is a common and noxious worldwide weed of increasing distribution in many European countries. In the present review, information on the biology, ecology, agricultural, economic and environmental impact of johnsongrass is given, and the current status of this weed in Europe is discussed. Furthermore, special attention is given to the important role of field trials using glyphosate to control weeds in arable and perennial crops in many European countries. Some of the factors which affect control efficacy and should be taken into account are also discussed. Finally, several non-chemical alternative methods (cultural, mechanical, thermal, biological, etc.) for johnsongrass management are also presented. The adoption of integrated weed management (IWM) techniques such as glyphosate use, crop rotation, and deep tillage is strongly recommended to control plant species that originate from both seed and rhizomes.

show abstract

Section: Chemical Control Of Johnsongrass With Emphasis To Glyphosatesupporting

confidence: 69%

Section: Chemical Control Of Johnsongrass With Emphasis To Glyphosatementioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Chemical Control Of Johnsongrass With Emphasis To Glyphosatementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Key Aspects on the Biology, Ecology and Impacts of Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers] and the Role of Glyphosate and Non-Chemical Alternative Practices for the Management of This Weed in Europe

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is evidence in the literature that fewer weeds emerge in the crop when weeds in the seedbed are controlled without disturbing the soil, either with pre‐emergence glyphosate (Riemens et al. , 2007; Dogan et al. , 2009) or with pre‐emergence flame weeding (Caldwell & Mohler, 2001; Boyd et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cultivation in the stale seedbed has two contrasting effects on weeds: it destroys weed seedlings, and it stimulates weed seed germination. There is evidence in the literature that fewer weeds emerge in the crop when weeds in the seedbed are controlled without disturbing the soil, either with pre-emergence glyphosate (Riemens et al, 2007;Dogan et al, 2009) or with pre-emergence flame weeding (Caldwell & Mohler, 2001;Boyd et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Punch planting, flame weeding and delayed sowing to reduce intra‐row weeds in row crops

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rasmussen J, Henriksen CB, Griepentrog HW & Nielsen J (2011). Punch planting, flame weeding and delayed sowing to reduce intra‐row weeds in row crops. Weed Research51, 489–498. Summary Punch planting has recently been suggested as a technique to reduce intra‐row weeds in organically grown row crops. The technique is to punch holes in the ground and seeds are then inserted, with a minimum of soil disturbance outside the hole. Two series of experiments with a tractor‐mounted prototype of a dibber drill (MK III) are presented. In the first series, three crop establishment procedures were compared over 2 years at five different sowing dates in sugar beet and direct‐sown onion. The crop establishment procedures were as follows: (i) normal sowing and mechanical control of weeds in the stale seedbed (N), (ii) N + pre‐emergence flame weeding (N + F) and (iii) punch planting and flame weeding to control weeds in the seedbed prior to crop emergence (P + F). The difference between N and N + F treatments quantifies the effect of pre‐emergence flame weeding, and the difference between N + F and P + F quantifies the effect of punch planting. Punch planting reduced the average intra‐row weed density by 37% in onion but had no main effect in sugar beet. In the second series of experiments in carrot, which compared the N + F and the P + F treatments only, punch planting reduced the average intra‐row weed density by 34%. Pre‐emergence flame weeding reduced the average weed density by 59% in onion and by 47% in sugar beet. Delayed sowing without pre‐emergence flame weeding only reduced weed emergence in 1 of 2 years, whereas delayed sowing had a more pronounced effect in flame‐weeded (N + F) and punch‐planted plots (P + F). In sugar beet and onion, there were complex interactions between crop establishment procedure, year and delayed sowing, which are partly explained by weather conditions and species‐specific germination patterns. It was concluded that technical improvements to the dibber drill (MK III) are required to take advantage of punch planting to reduce intra‐row weed densities.

show abstract

Climate Change and Ecologically Based Weed Management

Rao(A.N.Rao),

Korres

2023

Ecologically‐Based Weed Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effect of pre-sowing and pre-emergence glyphosate applications on weedsin stale seedbed cotton

Cited by 13 publications

References 8 publications

Key Aspects on the Biology, Ecology and Impacts of Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers] and the Role of Glyphosate and Non-Chemical Alternative Practices for the Management of This Weed in Europe

Key Aspects on the Biology, Ecology and Impacts of Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers] and the Role of Glyphosate and Non-Chemical Alternative Practices for the Management of This Weed in Europe

Punch planting, flame weeding and delayed sowing to reduce intra‐row weeds in row crops

Climate Change and Ecologically Based Weed Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About