2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pre-deformation on creep age forming of 2219 aluminum alloy: Experimental and constitutive modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material elongation decreased significantly when preliminary loadings occurred. Papers by Yang et al (2016Yang et al ( , 2017 concerned tests of alloy 2219. The influence of creep pre-deformation at a constant temperature (165 • C) at different load levels and for different aging times on the material yield point value was analyzed in those papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material elongation decreased significantly when preliminary loadings occurred. Papers by Yang et al (2016Yang et al ( , 2017 concerned tests of alloy 2219. The influence of creep pre-deformation at a constant temperature (165 • C) at different load levels and for different aging times on the material yield point value was analyzed in those papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creep behavior of aluminum alloys is very complicated and is usually accompanied by the combination changes such as creep strain, stress relaxation and micro-structure state, and so on. The effect of pre-stretching on alloy plates originates mainly from microstructure evolution, such as dislocation motion, grain growth, grain boundary slip, and second-phase precipitation, and the diffusion mechanism which are mainly induced by dislocation, precipitates and solute-matrix bonding [22]. For convenience in engineering application, Kowalewski et al [23] have proposed a unified creep damage model which can reflect the creep behaviors from the primary creep stage to the accelerated creep stage.…”
Section: Establishment Of Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum creep strain for h/t = 3 is 0.59%, which is much bigger than that for h/t = 0. This is because the plastic deformation produced during loading stage is equivalent to a pre-deformation for the material, promoting the creep deformation during the creep aging stage [26]. Figure 15 shows the creep strain distribution of AA7050 ribbed panels creep aged for 12 h. The creep deformation of the panel of h/t = 0 is homogeneous, and the maximum creep strain is 0.04%.…”
Section: Fe Model Validation Based On Springbackmentioning
confidence: 99%